From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: marc.zyngier@arm.com, agraf@suse.de, cdall@linaro.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "arm64: KVM: Allow unaligned accesses at EL2" has been added to the 4.11-stable tree
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:11:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <149725509810064@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
arm64: KVM: Allow unaligned accesses at EL2
to the 4.11-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
arm64-kvm-allow-unaligned-accesses-at-el2.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.11 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 78fd6dcf11468a5a131b8365580d0c613bcc02cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 19:08:34 +0100
Subject: arm64: KVM: Allow unaligned accesses at EL2
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
commit 78fd6dcf11468a5a131b8365580d0c613bcc02cb upstream.
We currently have the SCTLR_EL2.A bit set, trapping unaligned accesses
at EL2, but we're not really prepared to deal with it. So far, this
has been unnoticed, until GCC 7 started emitting those (in particular
64bit writes on a 32bit boundary).
Since the rest of the kernel is pretty happy about that, let's follow
its example and set SCTLR_EL2.A to zero. Modern CPUs don't really
care.
Reported-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp-init.S | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp-init.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp-init.S
@@ -104,9 +104,10 @@ __do_hyp_init:
/*
* Preserve all the RES1 bits while setting the default flags,
- * as well as the EE bit on BE.
+ * as well as the EE bit on BE. Drop the A flag since the compiler
+ * is allowed to generate unaligned accesses.
*/
- ldr x4, =(SCTLR_EL2_RES1 | SCTLR_ELx_FLAGS)
+ ldr x4, =(SCTLR_EL2_RES1 | (SCTLR_ELx_FLAGS & ~SCTLR_ELx_A))
CPU_BE( orr x4, x4, #SCTLR_ELx_EE)
msr sctlr_el2, x4
isb
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from marc.zyngier@arm.com are
queue-4.11/arm64-kvm-allow-unaligned-accesses-at-el2.patch
queue-4.11/arm-kvm-allow-unaligned-accesses-at-hyp.patch
queue-4.11/arm64-kvm-preserve-res1-bits-in-sctlr_el2.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-06-12 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=149725509810064@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=cdall@linaro.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.