All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: osandov@fb.com, clm@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow" has been added to the 4.11-stable tree
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:18:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1497259137220181@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow

to the 4.11-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     btrfs-fix-delalloc-accounting-leak-caused-by-u32-overflow.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.11 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 70e7af244f24c94604ef6eca32ad297632018583 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 01:20:01 -0700
Subject: Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow

From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>

commit 70e7af244f24c94604ef6eca32ad297632018583 upstream.

btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size() does an unsigned 32-bit multiplication,
which can overflow if num_items >= 4 GB / (nodesize * BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL * 2).
For a nodesize of 16kB, this overflow happens at 16k items. Usually,
num_items is a small constant passed to btrfs_start_transaction(), but
we also use btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size() for metadata reservations
for extent items in btrfs_delalloc_{reserve,release}_metadata().

In drop_outstanding_extents(), num_items is calculated as
inode->reserved_extents - inode->outstanding_extents. The difference
between these two counters is usually small, but if many delalloc
extents are reserved and then the outstanding extents are merged in
btrfs_merge_extent_hook(), the difference can become large enough to
overflow in btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size().

The overflow manifests itself as a leak of a multiple of 4 GB in
delalloc_block_rsv and the metadata bytes_may_use counter. This in turn
can cause early ENOSPC errors. Additionally, these WARN_ONs in
extent-tree.c will be hit when unmounting:

    WARN_ON(fs_info->delalloc_block_rsv.size > 0);
    WARN_ON(fs_info->delalloc_block_rsv.reserved > 0);
    WARN_ON(space_info->bytes_pinned > 0 ||
            space_info->bytes_reserved > 0 ||
            space_info->bytes_may_use > 0);

Fix it by casting nodesize to a u64 so that
btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size() does a full 64-bit multiplication.
While we're here, do the same in btrfs_calc_trunc_metadata_size(); this
can't overflow with any existing uses, but it's better to be safe here
than have another hard-to-debug problem later on.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.h |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -2547,7 +2547,7 @@ u64 btrfs_csum_bytes_to_leaves(struct bt
 static inline u64 btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 						 unsigned num_items)
 {
-	return fs_info->nodesize * BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL * 2 * num_items;
+	return (u64)fs_info->nodesize * BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL * 2 * num_items;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2557,7 +2557,7 @@ static inline u64 btrfs_calc_trans_metad
 static inline u64 btrfs_calc_trunc_metadata_size(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 						 unsigned num_items)
 {
-	return fs_info->nodesize * BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL * num_items;
+	return (u64)fs_info->nodesize * BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL * num_items;
 }
 
 int btrfs_should_throttle_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from osandov@fb.com are

queue-4.11/btrfs-fix-delalloc-accounting-leak-caused-by-u32-overflow.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-06-12  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1497259137220181@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.