From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ufs: restore maintaining ->i_blocks" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:19:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1497259195181114@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ufs: restore maintaining ->i_blocks
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ufs-restore-maintaining-i_blocks.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From eb315d2ae614493fd1ebb026c75a80573d84f7ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 21:15:03 -0400
Subject: ufs: restore maintaining ->i_blocks
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
commit eb315d2ae614493fd1ebb026c75a80573d84f7ad upstream.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/stat.c | 1 +
fs/ufs/balloc.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/stat.c
+++ b/fs/stat.c
@@ -454,6 +454,7 @@ void __inode_add_bytes(struct inode *ino
inode->i_bytes -= 512;
}
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__inode_add_bytes);
void inode_add_bytes(struct inode *inode, loff_t bytes)
{
--- a/fs/ufs/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ufs/balloc.c
@@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ void ufs_free_fragments(struct inode *in
ufs_error (sb, "ufs_free_fragments",
"bit already cleared for fragment %u", i);
}
-
+
+ inode_sub_bytes(inode, count << uspi->s_fshift);
fs32_add(sb, &ucg->cg_cs.cs_nffree, count);
uspi->cs_total.cs_nffree += count;
fs32_add(sb, &UFS_SB(sb)->fs_cs(cgno).cs_nffree, count);
@@ -183,6 +184,7 @@ do_more:
ufs_error(sb, "ufs_free_blocks", "freeing free fragment");
}
ubh_setblock(UCPI_UBH(ucpi), ucpi->c_freeoff, blkno);
+ inode_sub_bytes(inode, uspi->s_fpb << uspi->s_fshift);
if ((UFS_SB(sb)->s_flags & UFS_CG_MASK) == UFS_CG_44BSD)
ufs_clusteracct (sb, ucpi, blkno, 1);
@@ -494,6 +496,20 @@ u64 ufs_new_fragments(struct inode *inod
return 0;
}
+static bool try_add_frags(struct inode *inode, unsigned frags)
+{
+ unsigned size = frags * i_blocksize(inode);
+ spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+ __inode_add_bytes(inode, size);
+ if (unlikely((u32)inode->i_blocks != inode->i_blocks)) {
+ __inode_sub_bytes(inode, size);
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ return false;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ return true;
+}
+
static u64 ufs_add_fragments(struct inode *inode, u64 fragment,
unsigned oldcount, unsigned newcount)
{
@@ -530,6 +546,9 @@ static u64 ufs_add_fragments(struct inod
for (i = oldcount; i < newcount; i++)
if (ubh_isclr (UCPI_UBH(ucpi), ucpi->c_freeoff, fragno + i))
return 0;
+
+ if (!try_add_frags(inode, count))
+ return 0;
/*
* Block can be extended
*/
@@ -647,6 +666,7 @@ cg_found:
ubh_setbit (UCPI_UBH(ucpi), ucpi->c_freeoff, goal + i);
i = uspi->s_fpb - count;
+ inode_sub_bytes(inode, i << uspi->s_fshift);
fs32_add(sb, &ucg->cg_cs.cs_nffree, i);
uspi->cs_total.cs_nffree += i;
fs32_add(sb, &UFS_SB(sb)->fs_cs(cgno).cs_nffree, i);
@@ -657,6 +677,8 @@ cg_found:
result = ufs_bitmap_search (sb, ucpi, goal, allocsize);
if (result == INVBLOCK)
return 0;
+ if (!try_add_frags(inode, count))
+ return 0;
for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
ubh_clrbit (UCPI_UBH(ucpi), ucpi->c_freeoff, result + i);
@@ -716,6 +738,8 @@ norot:
return INVBLOCK;
ucpi->c_rotor = result;
gotit:
+ if (!try_add_frags(inode, uspi->s_fpb))
+ return 0;
blkno = ufs_fragstoblks(result);
ubh_clrblock (UCPI_UBH(ucpi), ucpi->c_freeoff, blkno);
if ((UFS_SB(sb)->s_flags & UFS_CG_MASK) == UFS_CG_44BSD)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk are
queue-4.9/ufs-set-correct-s_maxsize.patch
queue-4.9/ufs_getfrag_block-we-only-grab-truncate_mutex-on-block-creation-path.patch
queue-4.9/ufs-restore-proper-tail-allocation.patch
queue-4.9/ufs_extend_tail-fix-the-braino-in-calling-conventions-of-ufs_new_fragments.patch
queue-4.9/ufs-restore-maintaining-i_blocks.patch
queue-4.9/fix-ufs_isblockset.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-06-12 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1497259195181114@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.