From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/i915: Start writeback from the shrinker
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:07:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1497362824.5158.5.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170609110350.1767-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On pe, 2017-06-09 at 12:03 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> When we are called to relieve mempressue via the shrinker, the only way
> we can make progress is either by discarding unwanted pages (those
> objects that userspace has marked MADV_DONTNEED) or by reclaiming the
> dirty objects via swap. As we know that is the only way to make further
> progress, we can initiate the writeback as we invalidate the objects.
> This means the objects we put onto the inactive anon lru list are
> already marked for reclaim+writeback and so will trigger a wait upon the
> writeback inside direct reclaim, greatly improving the success rate of
> direct reclaim on i915 objects.
>
> The corollary is that we may start a slow swap on opportunistic
> mempressure from the likes of the compaction + migration kthreads. This
> is limited by those threads only being allowed to shrink idle pages, but
> also that if we reactivate the page before it is swapped out by gpu
> activity, we only page the cost of repinning the page. The cost is most
> felt when an object is reused after mempressure, which hopefully
> excludes the latency sensitive tasks (as we are just extending the
> impact of swap thrashing to them).
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
<SNIP>
> +static void __start_writeback(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> +{
<SNIP>
> + /* Force any other users of this object to refault */
> + mapping = obj->base.filp->f_mapping;
> + unmap_mapping_range(mapping, 0, (loff_t)-1, 0);
> +
> + /* Begin writeback on each dirty page */
> + for (i = 0; i < obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT; i++) {
> + struct page *page;
> +
> + page = find_lock_entry(mapping, i);
> + if (!page || radix_tree_exceptional_entry(page))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!page_mapped(page) && clear_page_dirty_for_io(page)) {
> + int ret;
> +
> + SetPageReclaim(page);
> + ret = mapping->a_ops->writepage(page, &wbc);
> + if (!PageWriteback(page))
> + ClearPageReclaim(page);
> + if (!ret)
> + goto put;
> + }
> + unlock_page(page);
> +put:
> + put_page(page);
> + }
Apart from this part (which should probably be a helper function
outside of i915), the code is:
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-13 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-09 11:03 [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915: Encourage our shrinker more when our shmemfs allocations fails Chris Wilson
2017-06-09 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915: Remove __GFP_NORETRY from our buffer allocator Chris Wilson
2017-06-09 11:07 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-13 14:01 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-06-09 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915: Only restrict noreclaim in the early shrink passes Chris Wilson
2017-06-13 14:02 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-06-09 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915: Spin for struct_mutex inside shrinker Chris Wilson
2017-06-13 13:59 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-06-09 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/i915: Start writeback from the shrinker Chris Wilson
2017-06-09 11:17 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-09 11:51 ` Chris Wilson
2017-06-09 13:35 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-13 14:07 ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2017-06-14 10:03 ` Chris Wilson
2017-06-09 11:31 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/5] drm/i915: Encourage our shrinker more when our shmemfs allocations fails Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1497362824.5158.5.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.