From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] of: Convert to using %pOF instead of full_name Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 13:58:34 -0700 Message-ID: <1497473914.18751.72.camel@perches.com> References: <20170614203025.7581-1-robh@kernel.org> <20170614203025.7581-5-robh@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170614203025.7581-5-robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Mark Rutland Cc: Pantelis Antoniou , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 15:30 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of > full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing > of the full path string for each node. Well, a full_name removal makes my reply in 2/4 less sensible. Maybe 2/4 should say that full_name is going away. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752372AbdFNU6j (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:58:39 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0236.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.236]:34575 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751664AbdFNU6h (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:58:37 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:968:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1537:1567:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3865:3866:3867:3870:3871:3874:4321:5007:6248:7903:9389:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12296:12740:12760:12895:13069:13311:13357:13439:14659:14721:14777:21080:21433:21627:30054:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: cloth05_8544e46ff7223 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1266 Message-ID: <1497473914.18751.72.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] of: Convert to using %pOF instead of full_name From: Joe Perches To: Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Mark Rutland Cc: Pantelis Antoniou , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 13:58:34 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170614203025.7581-5-robh@kernel.org> References: <20170614203025.7581-1-robh@kernel.org> <20170614203025.7581-5-robh@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 15:30 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of > full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing > of the full path string for each node. Well, a full_name removal makes my reply in 2/4 less sensible. Maybe 2/4 should say that full_name is going away.