From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: luto@kernel.org, bp@suse.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "sched/core: Idle_task_exit() shouldn't use switch_mm_irqs_off()" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 18:59:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1497783562115237@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
sched/core: Idle_task_exit() shouldn't use switch_mm_irqs_off()
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
sched-core-idle_task_exit-shouldn-t-use-switch_mm_irqs_off.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 252d2a4117bc181b287eeddf848863788da733ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 11:49:15 -0700
Subject: sched/core: Idle_task_exit() shouldn't use switch_mm_irqs_off()
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
commit 252d2a4117bc181b287eeddf848863788da733ae upstream.
idle_task_exit() can be called with IRQs on x86 on and therefore
should use switch_mm(), not switch_mm_irqs_off().
This doesn't seem to cause any problems right now, but it will
confuse my upcoming TLB flush changes. Nonetheless, I think it
should be backported because it's trivial. There won't be any
meaningful performance impact because idle_task_exit() is only
used when offlining a CPU.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: f98db6013c55 ("sched/core: Add switch_mm_irqs_off() and use it in the scheduler")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ca3d1a9fa93a0b49f5a8ff729eda3640fb6abdf9.1497034141.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5469,7 +5469,7 @@ void idle_task_exit(void)
BUG_ON(cpu_online(smp_processor_id()));
if (mm != &init_mm) {
- switch_mm_irqs_off(mm, &init_mm, current);
+ switch_mm(mm, &init_mm, current);
finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
}
mmdrop(mm);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from luto@kernel.org are
queue-4.9/sched-core-idle_task_exit-shouldn-t-use-switch_mm_irqs_off.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-06-18 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1497783562115237@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.