From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: paul.burton@imgtec.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, ralf@linux-mips.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "MIPS: Fix bnezc/jialc return address calculation" has been added to the 4.11-stable tree
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 09:13:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <149783481925471@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
MIPS: Fix bnezc/jialc return address calculation
to the 4.11-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mips-fix-bnezc-jialc-return-address-calculation.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.11 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 1a73d9310e093fc3adffba4d0a67b9fab2ee3f63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:35:01 -0700
Subject: MIPS: Fix bnezc/jialc return address calculation
From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
commit 1a73d9310e093fc3adffba4d0a67b9fab2ee3f63 upstream.
The code handling the pop76 opcode (ie. bnezc & jialc instructions) in
__compute_return_epc_for_insn() needs to set the value of $31 in the
jialc case, which is encoded with rs = 0. However its check to
differentiate bnezc (rs != 0) from jialc (rs = 0) was unfortunately
backwards, meaning that if we emulate a bnezc instruction we clobber $31
& if we emulate a jialc instruction it actually behaves like a jic
instruction.
Fix this by inverting the check of rs to match the way the instructions
are actually encoded.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Fixes: 28d6f93d201d ("MIPS: Emulate the new MIPS R6 BNEZC and JIALC instructions")
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/16178/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/mips/kernel/branch.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/branch.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/branch.c
@@ -804,8 +804,10 @@ int __compute_return_epc_for_insn(struct
break;
}
/* Compact branch: BNEZC || JIALC */
- if (insn.i_format.rs)
+ if (!insn.i_format.rs) {
+ /* JIALC: set $31/ra */
regs->regs[31] = epc + 4;
+ }
regs->cp0_epc += 8;
break;
#endif
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from paul.burton@imgtec.com are
queue-4.11/mips-.its-targets-depend-on-vmlinux.patch
queue-4.11/mips-fix-bnezc-jialc-return-address-calculation.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-06-19 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=149783481925471@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=paul.burton@imgtec.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.