From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v4.11.5-rt1
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:14:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1497867291.19618.52.camel@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170619085206.n2n22lpdfsoqbp5m@linutronix.de>
On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 10:52 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2017-06-17 10:14:37 [+0200], Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > During that rebase, migrate_disable() was changed to no longer map to
> > preempt_disable() for nonrt, but some patches still assume it does. It
> > now depends upon PREEMPT_COUNT, the RT workaround in futex.c induces
> > grumbling in nonrt builds with PREEMPT_COUNT enabled.
>
> argh, right. It was planned to get it merged upstream but due to
> $reasons we never got that far. For that reason I would simply revert
> that change and let migrate_disable() map to preempt_disable() as it did
> earlier.
Ok, doesn't matter for RT testing. What does matter, is that...
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 30b24f774198..10e832da70b6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2284,7 +2284,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(wake_up_process);
*/
int wake_up_lock_sleeper(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return try_to_wake_up(p, TASK_ALL, WF_LOCK_SLEEPER);
+ return try_to_wake_up(p, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, WF_LOCK_SLEEPER);
}
...appears to be inducing lost futex wakeups.
Scratch that "appears", changing it to TASK_NORMAL just fixed my DL980
running otherwise absolutely pristine 4.9-rt21, after having double
verified that rt20 works fine. Now to go back to 4.11/master/tip-rt,
make sure that the little bugger really really REALLY ain't fscking
with me for the sheer fun of it, futexes being made of pure evil :)
My testcase is to run futex_wait -n 4 in a modest sized loop. Odd
thing is that it only reproduces on the DL980 if I let it use multiple
sockets, pin it to one, and all is peachy, (rather seems to be given)
whereas on desktop box, the hang is far more intermittent, but there.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-19 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-16 10:56 [ANNOUNCE] v4.11.5-rt1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-17 8:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-18 6:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 8:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 10:14 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2017-06-19 10:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 11:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 11:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 12:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 14:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 14:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 15:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 16:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 16:27 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 16:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-19 14:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-06-19 14:13 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-19 14:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-06-19 16:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-20 7:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-22 16:34 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-22 17:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-22 21:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-23 2:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-23 12:48 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-18 17:01 ` [patch-rt] rtmutex: Fix lock stealing logic Mike Galbraith
2017-06-23 7:37 ` [patch-rt v2] " Mike Galbraith
2017-06-23 10:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-26 13:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-23 13:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-06-23 14:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-06-23 14:14 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1497867291.19618.52.camel@gmx.de \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.