From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: "Justin T. Weaver" <jtweaver@hawaii.edu>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] xen: sched: factor affinity helpers out of sched_credit.c
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:33:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1498224780.12549.1.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0fe6e31a-21ed-8423-7456-3e77f3d12401@citrix.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1748 bytes --]
On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 11:02 +0100, Anshul Makkar wrote:
> On 16/06/2017 15:13, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > diff --git a/xen/common/sched_credit.c b/xen/common/sched_credit.c
> > index efdf6bf..53773df 100644
> > --- a/xen/common/sched_credit.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/sched_credit.c
> > @@ -136,27 +136,6 @@
>
> *
> > + * Hard affinity balancing is always necessary and must never be
> > skipped.
> > + * But soft affinity need only be considered when it has a
> > functionally
> > + * different effect than other constraints (such as hard affinity,
> > cpus
> > + * online, or cpupools).
> > + *
> > + * Soft affinity only needs to be considered if:
> > + * * The cpus in the cpupool are not a subset of soft affinity
>
> do you mean cpus in a cpupool are not in a subset of the soft
> affinity
> of a vcpu which is a runnable state ?
>
Err... not sure. It's probably the same. IAC, what this means is that,
if a vcpu is in cpupool C, and the cpus of cpupool C are 1,2,3 _and_
the soft affinity of the vcpu is 0,1,2,3,4,5 then, it does not make
sense to check soft-affinity.
In fact, the vcpu will only execute on either 1,2 or 3, which are all
part of its soft-affinity anyway.
And it should be exactly that the cpupool is *a* *subset* of the soft-
affinity. In fact, if cpupool is 1,2,3 and soft-affinity is 0,1,3,4,5
then it _does_ make sense to check soft affinity,, to try not to run
the vcpu on 2.
Hope this clarify things.
Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 127 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-23 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-16 14:13 [PATCH 0/7] Soft affinity for Credit2 Dario Faggioli
2017-06-16 14:13 ` [PATCH 1/7] xen: sched: factor affinity helpers out of sched_credit.c Dario Faggioli
2017-06-23 10:02 ` Anshul Makkar
2017-06-23 13:33 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2017-06-16 14:13 ` [PATCH 2/7] xen/tools: credit2: soft-affinity awareness in runq_tickle() Dario Faggioli
2017-06-23 10:35 ` Anshul Makkar
2017-07-25 11:47 ` George Dunlap
2017-06-16 14:13 ` [PATCH 3/7] xen: credit2: soft-affinity awareness in fallback_cpu() Dario Faggioli
2017-07-25 10:19 ` George Dunlap
2017-07-25 10:20 ` George Dunlap
2017-07-25 16:00 ` Dario Faggioli
2017-07-25 16:17 ` George Dunlap
2017-07-25 16:47 ` Dario Faggioli
2017-07-25 16:52 ` George Dunlap
2017-07-25 17:30 ` Dario Faggioli
2017-06-16 14:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] xen: credit2: soft-affinity awareness in csched2_cpu_pick() Dario Faggioli
2017-07-25 10:54 ` George Dunlap
2017-07-25 11:04 ` George Dunlap
2017-07-25 11:05 ` George Dunlap
2017-06-16 14:14 ` [PATCH 5/7] xen: credit2: kick away vcpus not running within their soft-affinity Dario Faggioli
2017-07-25 11:06 ` George Dunlap
2017-06-16 14:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] xen: credit2: optimize runq_candidate() a little bit Dario Faggioli
2017-07-25 11:25 ` George Dunlap
2017-06-16 14:14 ` [PATCH 7/7] xen: credit2: try to avoid tickling cpus subject to ratelimiting Dario Faggioli
2017-07-25 11:31 ` George Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1498224780.12549.1.camel@citrix.com \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=anshul.makkar@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=jtweaver@hawaii.edu \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.