From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: john.stultz@linaro.org, danielmentz@google.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kevin.brodsky@arm.com,
mlichvar@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
stephen.boyd@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, will.deacon@arm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "time: Fix CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW sub-nanosecond accounting" has been added to the 4.11-stable tree
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 09:00:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1498460439220250@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
time: Fix CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW sub-nanosecond accounting
to the 4.11-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
time-fix-clock_monotonic_raw-sub-nanosecond-accounting.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.11 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 3d88d56c5873f6eebe23e05c3da701960146b801 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 16:44:21 -0700
Subject: time: Fix CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW sub-nanosecond accounting
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
commit 3d88d56c5873f6eebe23e05c3da701960146b801 upstream.
Due to how the MONOTONIC_RAW accumulation logic was handled,
there is the potential for a 1ns discontinuity when we do
accumulations. This small discontinuity has for the most part
gone un-noticed, but since ARM64 enabled CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW
in their vDSO clock_gettime implementation, we've seen failures
with the inconsistency-check test in kselftest.
This patch addresses the issue by using the same sub-ns
accumulation handling that CLOCK_MONOTONIC uses, which avoids
the issue for in-kernel users.
Since the ARM64 vDSO implementation has its own clock_gettime
calculation logic, this patch reduces the frequency of errors,
but failures are still seen. The ARM64 vDSO will need to be
updated to include the sub-nanosecond xtime_nsec values in its
calculation for this issue to be completely fixed.
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1496965462-20003-3-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/timekeeper_internal.h | 4 ++--
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/timekeeper_internal.h
+++ b/include/linux/timekeeper_internal.h
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct tk_read_base {
* interval.
* @xtime_remainder: Shifted nano seconds left over when rounding
* @cycle_interval
- * @raw_interval: Raw nano seconds accumulated per NTP interval.
+ * @raw_interval: Shifted raw nano seconds accumulated per NTP interval.
* @ntp_error: Difference between accumulated time and NTP time in ntp
* shifted nano seconds.
* @ntp_error_shift: Shift conversion between clock shifted nano seconds and
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ struct timekeeper {
u64 cycle_interval;
u64 xtime_interval;
s64 xtime_remainder;
- u32 raw_interval;
+ u64 raw_interval;
/* The ntp_tick_length() value currently being used.
* This cached copy ensures we consistently apply the tick
* length for an entire tick, as ntp_tick_length may change
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static void tk_setup_internals(struct ti
/* Go back from cycles -> shifted ns */
tk->xtime_interval = interval * clock->mult;
tk->xtime_remainder = ntpinterval - tk->xtime_interval;
- tk->raw_interval = (interval * clock->mult) >> clock->shift;
+ tk->raw_interval = interval * clock->mult;
/* if changing clocks, convert xtime_nsec shift units */
if (old_clock) {
@@ -1997,7 +1997,7 @@ static u64 logarithmic_accumulation(stru
u32 shift, unsigned int *clock_set)
{
u64 interval = tk->cycle_interval << shift;
- u64 raw_nsecs;
+ u64 snsec_per_sec;
/* If the offset is smaller than a shifted interval, do nothing */
if (offset < interval)
@@ -2012,14 +2012,15 @@ static u64 logarithmic_accumulation(stru
*clock_set |= accumulate_nsecs_to_secs(tk);
/* Accumulate raw time */
- raw_nsecs = (u64)tk->raw_interval << shift;
- raw_nsecs += tk->raw_time.tv_nsec;
- if (raw_nsecs >= NSEC_PER_SEC) {
- u64 raw_secs = raw_nsecs;
- raw_nsecs = do_div(raw_secs, NSEC_PER_SEC);
- tk->raw_time.tv_sec += raw_secs;
+ tk->tkr_raw.xtime_nsec += (u64)tk->raw_time.tv_nsec << tk->tkr_raw.shift;
+ tk->tkr_raw.xtime_nsec += tk->raw_interval << shift;
+ snsec_per_sec = (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC << tk->tkr_raw.shift;
+ while (tk->tkr_raw.xtime_nsec >= snsec_per_sec) {
+ tk->tkr_raw.xtime_nsec -= snsec_per_sec;
+ tk->raw_time.tv_sec++;
}
- tk->raw_time.tv_nsec = raw_nsecs;
+ tk->raw_time.tv_nsec = tk->tkr_raw.xtime_nsec >> tk->tkr_raw.shift;
+ tk->tkr_raw.xtime_nsec -= (u64)tk->raw_time.tv_nsec << tk->tkr_raw.shift;
/* Accumulate error between NTP and clock interval */
tk->ntp_error += tk->ntp_tick << shift;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from john.stultz@linaro.org are
queue-4.11/time-fix-clock-read-clock-race-around-clocksource-changes.patch
queue-4.11/time-fix-clock_monotonic_raw-sub-nanosecond-accounting.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-06-26 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1498460439220250@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=danielmentz@google.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen.boyd@linaro.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.