All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: will.deacon@arm.com, danielmentz@google.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, john.stultz@linaro.org,
	kevin.brodsky@arm.com, mlichvar@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com,
	richardcochran@gmail.com, stephen.boyd@linaro.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "arm64/vdso: Fix nsec handling for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW" has been added to the 4.11-stable tree
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 09:25:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <149846191114310@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    arm64/vdso: Fix nsec handling for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW

to the 4.11-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     arm64-vdso-fix-nsec-handling-for-clock_monotonic_raw.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.11 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From dbb236c1ceb697a559e0694ac4c9e7b9131d0b16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 16:44:22 -0700
Subject: arm64/vdso: Fix nsec handling for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW

From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

commit dbb236c1ceb697a559e0694ac4c9e7b9131d0b16 upstream.

Recently vDSO support for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW was added in
49eea433b326 ("arm64: Add support for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW in
clock_gettime() vDSO"). Noticing that the core timekeeping code
never set tkr_raw.xtime_nsec, the vDSO implementation didn't
bother exposing it via the data page and instead took the
unshifted tk->raw_time.tv_nsec value which was then immediately
shifted left in the vDSO code.

Unfortunately, by accellerating the MONOTONIC_RAW clockid, it
uncovered potential 1ns time inconsistencies caused by the
timekeeping core not handing sub-ns resolution.

Now that the core code has been fixed and is actually setting
tkr_raw.xtime_nsec, we need to take that into account in the
vDSO by adding it to the shifted raw_time value, in order to
fix the user-visible inconsistency. Rather than do that at each
use (and expand the data page in the process), instead perform
the shift/addition operation when populating the data page and
remove the shift from the vDSO code entirely.

[jstultz: minor whitespace tweak, tried to improve commit
 message to make it more clear this fixes a regression]
Reported-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>
Acked-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org>
Cc: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1496965462-20003-4-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c              |    5 +++--
 arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S |    1 -
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c
@@ -221,10 +221,11 @@ void update_vsyscall(struct timekeeper *
 		/* tkr_mono.cycle_last == tkr_raw.cycle_last */
 		vdso_data->cs_cycle_last	= tk->tkr_mono.cycle_last;
 		vdso_data->raw_time_sec		= tk->raw_time.tv_sec;
-		vdso_data->raw_time_nsec	= tk->raw_time.tv_nsec;
+		vdso_data->raw_time_nsec	= (tk->raw_time.tv_nsec <<
+						   tk->tkr_raw.shift) +
+						  tk->tkr_raw.xtime_nsec;
 		vdso_data->xtime_clock_sec	= tk->xtime_sec;
 		vdso_data->xtime_clock_nsec	= tk->tkr_mono.xtime_nsec;
-		/* tkr_raw.xtime_nsec == 0 */
 		vdso_data->cs_mono_mult		= tk->tkr_mono.mult;
 		vdso_data->cs_raw_mult		= tk->tkr_raw.mult;
 		/* tkr_mono.shift == tkr_raw.shift */
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S
@@ -256,7 +256,6 @@ monotonic_raw:
 	seqcnt_check fail=monotonic_raw
 
 	/* All computations are done with left-shifted nsecs. */
-	lsl	x14, x14, x12
 	get_nsec_per_sec res=x9
 	lsl	x9, x9, x12
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from will.deacon@arm.com are

queue-4.11/time-fix-clock_monotonic_raw-sub-nanosecond-accounting.patch
queue-4.11/arm64-vdso-fix-nsec-handling-for-clock_monotonic_raw.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-06-26  7:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=149846191114310@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=danielmentz@google.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen.boyd@linaro.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.