From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 3E940E00B8D; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 12:29:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.223.173 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.223.173 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com (mail-io0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867D5E00B77 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 12:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r36so23724130ioi.1 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 12:29:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/gZK0ytMAU47JtpFxgHqrQtVZuemlv5FOKVA+iQPPsk=; b=nrkHJjIlYfn/IDhaVSVyicMj9a43/ec8QNp3fEOMXBlktKs5vQARvr8/zB1jIAHB7+ O5i6A+Hhuo0NTC9iuJd7c5f41TGtO6JFABvG6QDDkim5YibfCmOcFQixnVC0veCLKGgX hssVN5xGqp0bsTZEvlSVfTei9PStbJjrcmbvdyaH6HKGZb+vPdMUUzPxsYN2BKFKqsf0 vofwLhTg+cTvrcJdpNuSWWy/ij5IZD5N974lr5ys8opqbi3quk/+AocBRbDU3uu2hbED +G7ECtxBZF7+DZvAaMJm1+ugvqxzuLtImefdukxfoGA267C8o2HpB+XhujQFw71c8CQ7 qOGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/gZK0ytMAU47JtpFxgHqrQtVZuemlv5FOKVA+iQPPsk=; b=gRixvkN1KrpqvWANHXmcn1i/pe3qRuZr5J8K4ZwmuRwryXDXAoXDVu1gAgA4LIe386 HptLXBiYPlTgC0sva9UezqNQV/T6GZi92ZvbFSForYKhPkz+Axwrkl62MNLXZUhp1/vV 4Rd0VtCoPMGD/yW6UR9djOcVvYt4c+w9Za/7pezriDrPFZ9B5EE/uGh8wBHTkemrHzE5 dmlAzBpxdDZcYGkp0yZsXyMSC6UowBof8JYgKHXDGosuFvlDrcCxgXUrFUsIC+3+cXhV jCuFa0cSSnVFSGE41CmO1auv9HEHafLRyPyMsTtfAVGYbjZ/WdN1sw5U/1DTAtOrwrea bLFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOz9eWt5/Icwu4Di3MjEugHpp3U2zvHAXwozoiW+tqBL6kI+I0y8 JoA/EghqPK+6NUuw X-Received: by 10.107.165.148 with SMTP id o142mr3622809ioe.179.1498591740502; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 12:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8FB9F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.251.159]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 86sm51759ioj.8.2017.06.27.12.28.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Jun 2017 12:28:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1498591737.7464.71.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: "Paul D. DeRocco" Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 21:28:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <76B86AF8C15644E6B45FF1D6E4D85B60@PAULD> References: <1498550334.7464.21.camel@intel.com> <76B86AF8C15644E6B45FF1D6E4D85B60@PAULD> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: How do you remove an IMAGEFS? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 19:29:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 12:08 -0700, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > However, when I explicitly added "hddimg", I found that Syslinux was > still configured for live image, with "boot" and "install" menu > options. I found some code in image.bbclass that looks like it forces > "image-live" if either "iso" or "hddimg" is included. I can of course > hide that by setting various Syslinux options, but how do I get a > plain hddimg that just boots up and runs, without any support for an > "install" option in the kernel? Is that normally done with "wic" and a > minimal .wks script? I don't know that much about how boot loader menus get generated (we don't use a boot loader in refkit). But yes, wic is the mechanism of choice for creating images these days. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.