All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, andreyknvl@google.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, lucien.xin@gmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "igmp: acquire pmc lock for ip_mc_clear_src()" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:59:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <149875554472238@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    igmp: acquire pmc lock for ip_mc_clear_src()

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     igmp-acquire-pmc-lock-for-ip_mc_clear_src.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Thu Jun 29 18:57:46 CEST 2017
From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:52:26 -0700
Subject: igmp: acquire pmc lock for ip_mc_clear_src()

From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>


[ Upstream commit c38b7d327aafd1e3ad7ff53eefac990673b65667 ]

Andrey reported a use-after-free in add_grec():

        for (psf = *psf_list; psf; psf = psf_next) {
		...
                psf_next = psf->sf_next;

where the struct ip_sf_list's were already freed by:

 kfree+0xe8/0x2b0 mm/slub.c:3882
 ip_mc_clear_src+0x69/0x1c0 net/ipv4/igmp.c:2078
 ip_mc_dec_group+0x19a/0x470 net/ipv4/igmp.c:1618
 ip_mc_drop_socket+0x145/0x230 net/ipv4/igmp.c:2609
 inet_release+0x4e/0x1c0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:411
 sock_release+0x8d/0x1e0 net/socket.c:597
 sock_close+0x16/0x20 net/socket.c:1072

This happens because we don't hold pmc->lock in ip_mc_clear_src()
and a parallel mr_ifc_timer timer could jump in and access them.

The RCU lock is there but it is merely for pmc itself, this
spinlock could actually ensure we don't access them in parallel.

Thanks to Eric and Long for discussion on this bug.

Reported-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/igmp.c |   21 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/igmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
@@ -2071,21 +2071,26 @@ static int ip_mc_add_src(struct in_devic
 
 static void ip_mc_clear_src(struct ip_mc_list *pmc)
 {
-	struct ip_sf_list *psf, *nextpsf;
+	struct ip_sf_list *psf, *nextpsf, *tomb, *sources;
 
-	for (psf = pmc->tomb; psf; psf = nextpsf) {
+	spin_lock_bh(&pmc->lock);
+	tomb = pmc->tomb;
+	pmc->tomb = NULL;
+	sources = pmc->sources;
+	pmc->sources = NULL;
+	pmc->sfmode = MCAST_EXCLUDE;
+	pmc->sfcount[MCAST_INCLUDE] = 0;
+	pmc->sfcount[MCAST_EXCLUDE] = 1;
+	spin_unlock_bh(&pmc->lock);
+
+	for (psf = tomb; psf; psf = nextpsf) {
 		nextpsf = psf->sf_next;
 		kfree(psf);
 	}
-	pmc->tomb = NULL;
-	for (psf = pmc->sources; psf; psf = nextpsf) {
+	for (psf = sources; psf; psf = nextpsf) {
 		nextpsf = psf->sf_next;
 		kfree(psf);
 	}
-	pmc->sources = NULL;
-	pmc->sfmode = MCAST_EXCLUDE;
-	pmc->sfcount[MCAST_INCLUDE] = 0;
-	pmc->sfcount[MCAST_EXCLUDE] = 1;
 }
 
 /* Join a multicast group


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com are

queue-4.9/igmp-add-a-missing-spin_lock_init.patch
queue-4.9/igmp-acquire-pmc-lock-for-ip_mc_clear_src.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-06-29 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=149875554472238@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.