From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "Btrfs: Fix deadlock between direct IO and fast fsync" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 12:02:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <149907616724246@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
Btrfs: Fix deadlock between direct IO and fast fsync
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
btrfs-fix-deadlock-between-direct-io-and-fast-fsync.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Mon Jul 3 11:54:13 CEST 2017
From: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:00:18 +0530
Subject: Btrfs: Fix deadlock between direct IO and fast fsync
From: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ Upstream commit 97dcdea076ecef41ea4aaa23d4397c2f622e4265 ]
The following deadlock is seen when executing generic/113 test,
---------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Direct I/O task Fast fsync task
---------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------
btrfs_direct_IO
__blockdev_direct_IO
do_blockdev_direct_IO
do_direct_IO
btrfs_get_blocks_direct
while (blocks needs to written)
get_more_blocks (first iteration)
btrfs_get_blocks_direct
btrfs_create_dio_extent
down_read(&BTRFS_I(inode) >dio_sem)
Create and add extent map and ordered extent
up_read(&BTRFS_I(inode) >dio_sem)
btrfs_sync_file
btrfs_log_dentry_safe
btrfs_log_inode_parent
btrfs_log_inode
btrfs_log_changed_extents
down_write(&BTRFS_I(inode) >dio_sem)
Collect new extent maps and ordered extents
wait for ordered extent completion
get_more_blocks (second iteration)
btrfs_get_blocks_direct
btrfs_create_dio_extent
down_read(&BTRFS_I(inode) >dio_sem)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the above description, Btrfs direct I/O code path has not yet started
submitting bios for file range covered by the initial ordered
extent. Meanwhile, The fast fsync task obtains the write semaphore and
waits for I/O on the ordered extent to get completed. However, the
Direct I/O task is now blocked on obtaining the read semaphore.
To resolve the deadlock, this commit modifies the Direct I/O code path
to obtain the read semaphore before invoking
__blockdev_direct_IO(). The semaphore is then given up after
__blockdev_direct_IO() returns. This allows the Direct I/O code to
complete I/O on all the ordered extents it creates.
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -7235,7 +7235,6 @@ static struct extent_map *btrfs_create_d
struct extent_map *em = NULL;
int ret;
- down_read(&BTRFS_I(inode)->dio_sem);
if (type != BTRFS_ORDERED_NOCOW) {
em = create_pinned_em(inode, start, len, orig_start,
block_start, block_len, orig_block_len,
@@ -7254,7 +7253,6 @@ static struct extent_map *btrfs_create_d
em = ERR_PTR(ret);
}
out:
- up_read(&BTRFS_I(inode)->dio_sem);
return em;
}
@@ -8707,6 +8705,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_direct_IO(struct ki
dio_data.unsubmitted_oe_range_start = (u64)offset;
dio_data.unsubmitted_oe_range_end = (u64)offset;
current->journal_info = &dio_data;
+ down_read(&BTRFS_I(inode)->dio_sem);
} else if (test_bit(BTRFS_INODE_READDIO_NEED_LOCK,
&BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags)) {
inode_dio_end(inode);
@@ -8719,6 +8718,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_direct_IO(struct ki
iter, btrfs_get_blocks_direct, NULL,
btrfs_submit_direct, flags);
if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE) {
+ up_read(&BTRFS_I(inode)->dio_sem);
current->journal_info = NULL;
if (ret < 0 && ret != -EIOCBQUEUED) {
if (dio_data.reserve)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com are
queue-4.9/btrfs-fix-deadlock-between-direct-io-and-fast-fsync.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-07-03 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=149907616724246@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.