All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@codeaurora.org>
To: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@codeaurora.org>,
	Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Nicholas Troast <ntroast@codeaurora.org>,
	Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V1 4/5] spmi: pmic-arb: return the value instead of passing by pointer
Date: Mon,  3 Jul 2017 17:48:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1499084308-2232-5-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499084308-2232-1-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org>

Returning the output value from a function, when it is possible, is the
better and cleaner way than passing it by the pointer. Hence, modify
the ppid_to_apid mapping function to return apid instead of passing
it by a pointer. While at it, pass the ppid as function parameter to
ppid_to_apid mapping function instead of passing the sid and addr.

Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
index d8c857a..5285245 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
@@ -179,8 +179,7 @@ struct spmi_pmic_arb {
  */
 struct pmic_arb_ver_ops {
 	const char *ver_str;
-	int (*ppid_to_apid)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
-			u16 *apid);
+	int (*ppid_to_apid)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid);
 	/* spmi commands (read_cmd, write_cmd, cmd) functionality */
 	int (*offset)(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
 		      u32 *offset);
@@ -657,8 +656,8 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_domain_dt_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
 					   unsigned int *out_type)
 {
 	struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb = d->host_data;
+	u16 apid, ppid;
 	int rc;
-	u16 apid;
 
 	dev_dbg(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "intspec[0] 0x%1x intspec[1] 0x%02x intspec[2] 0x%02x\n",
 		intspec[0], intspec[1], intspec[2]);
@@ -670,14 +669,15 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_domain_dt_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
 	if (intspec[0] > 0xF || intspec[1] > 0xFF || intspec[2] > 0x7)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->ppid_to_apid(pmic_arb, intspec[0],
-					    (intspec[1] << 8), &apid);
+	ppid = intspec[0] << 8 | intspec[1];
+	rc = pmic_arb->ver_ops->ppid_to_apid(pmic_arb, ppid);
 	if (rc < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "failed to xlate sid = 0x%x, periph = 0x%x, irq = %x rc = %d\n",
 		intspec[0], intspec[1], intspec[2], rc);
 		return rc;
 	}
 
+	apid = rc;
 	/* Keep track of {max,min}_apid for bounding search during interrupt */
 	if (apid > pmic_arb->max_apid)
 		pmic_arb->max_apid = apid;
@@ -706,19 +706,18 @@ static int qpnpint_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid,
-				    u16 addr, u16 *apid)
+static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
 {
-	u16 ppid = sid << 8 | ((addr >> 8) & 0xFF);
 	u32 *mapping_table = pmic_arb->mapping_table;
 	int index = 0, i;
 	u16 apid_valid;
+	u16 apid;
 	u32 data;
 
 	apid_valid = pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid];
 	if (apid_valid & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID) {
-		*apid = apid_valid & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
-		return 0;
+		apid = apid_valid & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+		return apid;
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_TREE_DEPTH; ++i) {
@@ -732,21 +731,21 @@ static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid,
 			if (SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_1_FLAG(data)) {
 				index = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_1_RESULT(data);
 			} else {
-				*apid = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_1_RESULT(data);
+				apid = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_1_RESULT(data);
 				pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid]
-					= *apid | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
-				pmic_arb->apid_data[*apid].ppid = ppid;
-				return 0;
+					= apid | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+				pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].ppid = ppid;
+				return apid;
 			}
 		} else {
 			if (SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_0_FLAG(data)) {
 				index = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_0_RESULT(data);
 			} else {
-				*apid = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_0_RESULT(data);
+				apid = SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_0_RESULT(data);
 				pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid]
-					= *apid | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
-				pmic_arb->apid_data[*apid].ppid = ppid;
-				return 0;
+					= apid | PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
+				pmic_arb->apid_data[apid].ppid = ppid;
+				return apid;
 			}
 		}
 	}
@@ -798,10 +797,8 @@ static u16 pmic_arb_find_apid(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
 	return i;
 }
 
-static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid,
-				    u16 addr, u16 *apid)
+static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u16 ppid)
 {
-	u16 ppid = (sid << 8) | (addr >> 8);
 	u16 apid_valid;
 
 	apid_valid = pmic_arb->ppid_to_apid[ppid];
@@ -810,8 +807,7 @@ static int pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid,
 	if (!(apid_valid & PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	*apid = apid_valid & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
-	return 0;
+	return apid_valid & ~PMIC_ARB_APID_VALID;
 }
 
 /* v2 offset per ppid and per ee */
@@ -819,12 +815,15 @@ static int pmic_arb_offset_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb, u8 sid, u16 addr,
 				u32 *offset)
 {
 	u16 apid;
+	u16 ppid;
 	int rc;
 
-	rc = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(pmic_arb, sid, addr, &apid);
+	ppid = sid << 8 | ((addr >> 8) & 0xFF);
+	rc = pmic_arb_ppid_to_apid_v2(pmic_arb, ppid);
 	if (rc < 0)
 		return rc;
 
+	apid = rc;
 	*offset = 0x1000 * pmic_arb->ee + 0x8000 * apid;
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-03 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-03 12:18 [PATCH V1 0/5]: Fix-up patches Kiran Gunda
2017-07-03 12:18 ` Kiran Gunda
2017-07-03 12:18 ` [PATCH V1 1/5] spmi: pmic-arb: remove the read/write access checks Kiran Gunda
2017-07-06  6:48   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-03 12:18 ` [PATCH V1 2/5] spmi: pmic-arb: rename pa_xx to pmic_arb_xx and other code cleanup Kiran Gunda
2017-07-06  6:49   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-07 14:48     ` kgunda
2017-07-03 12:18 ` [PATCH V1 3/5] spmi: pmic-arb: replace the writel_relaxed with __raw_writel Kiran Gunda
2017-07-06  6:44   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-03 12:18 ` Kiran Gunda [this message]
2017-07-06  6:44   ` [PATCH V1 4/5] spmi: pmic-arb: return the value instead of passing by pointer Stephen Boyd
2017-07-03 12:18 ` [PATCH V1 5/5] spmi: pmic-arb: use irq_chip callback to set spmi irq wakeup capability Kiran Gunda
2017-07-06  6:46   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-06 10:30     ` kgunda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1499084308-2232-5-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org \
    --to=kgunda@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=adharmap@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ntroast@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.