All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1499699561.6034.129.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 2c551a6..2dc61cb 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -68,17 +68,12 @@ On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 17:03 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
 > Is avoiding use of __vfs_read() is intentional?
 
 Yes, some filesystems ->read_iter attempt to take the i_rwsem, which
-IMA has already taken. ?This patch set introduces a new file operation
+IMA has already taken.  This patch set introduces a new file operation
 method ->integrity_read, which reads the file without re-taking the
-lock. ?(This method should probably be renamed ->integrity_read_iter.)
+lock.  (This method should probably be renamed ->integrity_read_iter.)
 
 The next version of this patch set will remove this patch, unless
-someone provides a reason for needing it. ?At that point, a new method
+someone provides a reason for needing it.  At that point, a new method
 equivalent to ->read would need to be defined.
 
 Mimi
-
---
-To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
-the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
-More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 25b1e46..7bf4732 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,10 +1,15 @@
  "ref\01497031364-19949-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
  "ref\01497031364-19949-4-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
  "ref\0CACE9dm8SVrkVm+5MmDg+BTGiJYzoqwB-jCCXJ5ac8xkG65qAcw@mail.gmail.com\0"
- "From\0zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar)\0"
- "Subject\0[Linux-ima-devel] [PATCH 3/4] ima: use existing read file operation method to calculate file hash\0"
+ "From\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [Linux-ima-devel] [PATCH 3/4] ima: use existing read file operation method to calculate file hash\0"
  "Date\0Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:12:41 -0400\0"
- "To\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0"
+ "To\0Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>"
+  Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
+  linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-ima-devel <linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
+ " linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 17:03 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:\n"
@@ -77,19 +82,14 @@
  "> Is avoiding use of __vfs_read() is intentional?\n"
  "\n"
  "Yes, some filesystems ->read_iter attempt to take the i_rwsem, which\n"
- "IMA has already taken. ?This patch set introduces a new file operation\n"
+ "IMA has already taken. \302\240This patch set introduces a new file operation\n"
  "method ->integrity_read, which reads the file without re-taking the\n"
- "lock. ?(This method should probably be renamed ->integrity_read_iter.)\n"
+ "lock. \302\240(This method should probably be renamed ->integrity_read_iter.)\n"
  "\n"
  "The next version of this patch set will remove this patch, unless\n"
- "someone provides a reason for needing it. ?At that point, a new method\n"
+ "someone provides a reason for needing it. \302\240At that point, a new method\n"
  "equivalent to ->read would need to be defined.\n"
  "\n"
- "Mimi\n"
- "\n"
- "--\n"
- "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n"
- "the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n"
- More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
+ Mimi
 
-745d5a88f7fa864442090ac05f5fff8f5678664cebba66fb3301b7faad284e0c
+c1d62940765e0960947986a577fe7d786989d9253e9c30f44a7bb4cb5c969b30

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.