From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jgross@suse.com, andre.przywara@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "xen: avoid deadlock in xenbus driver" has been added to the 4.11-stable tree
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:39:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <149970479471117@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
xen: avoid deadlock in xenbus driver
to the 4.11-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
xen-avoid-deadlock-in-xenbus-driver.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.11 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 1a3fc2c402810bf336882e695abd1678dbc8d279 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 16:03:42 +0200
Subject: xen: avoid deadlock in xenbus driver
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
commit 1a3fc2c402810bf336882e695abd1678dbc8d279 upstream.
There has been a report about a deadlock in the xenbus driver:
[ 247.979498] ======================================================
[ 247.985688] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 247.991882] 4.12.0-rc4-00022-gc4b25c0 #575 Not tainted
[ 247.997040] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 248.003232] xenbus/91 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 248.007875] (&u->msgbuffer_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffff00000863e904>]
xenbus_dev_queue_reply+0x3c/0x230
[ 248.017163]
[ 248.017163] but task is already holding lock:
[ 248.023096] (xb_write_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffff00000863a940>]
xenbus_thread+0x5f0/0x798
[ 248.031267]
[ 248.031267] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 248.031267]
[ 248.039615]
[ 248.039615] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 248.047176]
[ 248.047176] -> #1 (xb_write_mutex){+.+...}:
[ 248.052943] __lock_acquire+0x1728/0x1778
[ 248.057498] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x288
[ 248.061630] __mutex_lock+0x84/0x868
[ 248.065755] mutex_lock_nested+0x3c/0x50
[ 248.070227] xs_send+0x164/0x1f8
[ 248.074015] xenbus_dev_request_and_reply+0x6c/0x88
[ 248.079427] xenbus_file_write+0x260/0x420
[ 248.084073] __vfs_write+0x48/0x138
[ 248.088113] vfs_write+0xa8/0x1b8
[ 248.091983] SyS_write+0x54/0xb0
[ 248.095768] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
[ 248.099897]
[ 248.099897] -> #0 (&u->msgbuffer_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[ 248.106088] print_circular_bug+0x80/0x2e0
[ 248.110730] __lock_acquire+0x1768/0x1778
[ 248.115288] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x288
[ 248.119417] __mutex_lock+0x84/0x868
[ 248.123545] mutex_lock_nested+0x3c/0x50
[ 248.128016] xenbus_dev_queue_reply+0x3c/0x230
[ 248.133005] xenbus_thread+0x788/0x798
[ 248.137306] kthread+0x110/0x140
[ 248.141087] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x40
It is rather easy to avoid by dropping xb_write_mutex before calling
xenbus_dev_queue_reply().
Fixes: fd8aa9095a95c02dcc35540a263267c29b8fda9d ("xen: optimize xenbus
driver for multiple concurrent xenstore accesses").
Reported-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c
@@ -299,17 +299,7 @@ static int process_msg(void)
mutex_lock(&xb_write_mutex);
list_for_each_entry(req, &xs_reply_list, list) {
if (req->msg.req_id == state.msg.req_id) {
- if (req->state == xb_req_state_wait_reply) {
- req->msg.type = state.msg.type;
- req->msg.len = state.msg.len;
- req->body = state.body;
- req->state = xb_req_state_got_reply;
- list_del(&req->list);
- req->cb(req);
- } else {
- list_del(&req->list);
- kfree(req);
- }
+ list_del(&req->list);
err = 0;
break;
}
@@ -317,6 +307,15 @@ static int process_msg(void)
mutex_unlock(&xb_write_mutex);
if (err)
goto out;
+
+ if (req->state == xb_req_state_wait_reply) {
+ req->msg.type = state.msg.type;
+ req->msg.len = state.msg.len;
+ req->body = state.body;
+ req->state = xb_req_state_got_reply;
+ req->cb(req);
+ } else
+ kfree(req);
}
mutex_unlock(&xs_response_mutex);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jgross@suse.com are
queue-4.11/xen-avoid-deadlock-in-xenbus-driver.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-07-10 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=149970479471117@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.