Re: [PATCH 4/4] hook: add a simple first example

[Kaartic Sivaraam <kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com>]

On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 13:02 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Kaartic Sivaraam <kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >  I made an attempt to make the second example work with amending 
> >  with the aim of making it suitable for usage out of the box. It
> >  seems that it's not easy to make it work as the status of a file
> >  cannot be determined correctly when the index while amending
> >  introduces changes to a file that has a change in the commit being
> >  amended.
> > 
> >  Is there any way in which the second example could be made to work
> > with
> >  amending without much effort? I'm asking this assuming something
> > might
> >  have happened, since the script was added, that could ease the
> > task.
> 
> Sorry, but I do not understand what you are asking here.
> 
I'm was trying to ask, "Is there any way to change the second example
(diff --name-status) to make it work with "commit --amend" so that it
could be uncommented by default ?" 

If there was a way then the patch 4/4 could be dropped as the name
status example would be enough make the script live (I think). 

> After going back and checking 1/4, I realize that I misread the
> patch.
> you did keep the commented out 'diff --name-status' thing, so it
> still
> has three---it just lost one half of the original "first"
> example.  So
> please disregard my earlier "do we still have three, not two?"
> 
Actually speaking, I did think of promoting the second to the first to
make the sub-patches independent of each other. I held myself as I
thought it would be overkill. Anyways, I'll just overkill it!