From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: acme@redhat.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, dsahern@gmail.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, wangnan0@huawei.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "perf dwarf: Guard !x86_64 definitions under #ifdef else clause" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 15:02:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <149995097217991@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
perf dwarf: Guard !x86_64 definitions under #ifdef else clause
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
perf-dwarf-guard-x86_64-definitions-under-ifdef-else-clause.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 62aa0e177d278462145a29c30d3c8501ae57e200 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 12:04:29 -0300
Subject: perf dwarf: Guard !x86_64 definitions under #ifdef else clause
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
commit 62aa0e177d278462145a29c30d3c8501ae57e200 upstream.
To fix the build on Fedora Rawhide (gcc 6.0.0 20160311 (Red Hat 6.0.0-0.17):
CC /tmp/build/perf/arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.o
arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c:66:36: error: 'x86_32_regoffset_table' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
static const struct pt_regs_offset x86_32_regoffset_table[] = {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-fghuksc1u8ln82bof4lwcj0o@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
tools/perf/arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.c
@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ struct pt_regs_offset {
# define REG_OFFSET_NAME_32(n, r) {.name = n, .offset = offsetof(struct pt_regs, r)}
#endif
+/* TODO: switching by dwarf address size */
+#ifndef __x86_64__
static const struct pt_regs_offset x86_32_regoffset_table[] = {
REG_OFFSET_NAME_32("%ax", eax),
REG_OFFSET_NAME_32("%cx", ecx),
@@ -75,6 +77,8 @@ static const struct pt_regs_offset x86_3
REG_OFFSET_END,
};
+#define regoffset_table x86_32_regoffset_table
+#else
static const struct pt_regs_offset x86_64_regoffset_table[] = {
REG_OFFSET_NAME_64("%ax", rax),
REG_OFFSET_NAME_64("%dx", rdx),
@@ -95,11 +99,7 @@ static const struct pt_regs_offset x86_6
REG_OFFSET_END,
};
-/* TODO: switching by dwarf address size */
-#ifdef __x86_64__
#define regoffset_table x86_64_regoffset_table
-#else
-#define regoffset_table x86_32_regoffset_table
#endif
/* Minus 1 for the ending REG_OFFSET_END */
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from acme@redhat.com are
queue-4.4/perf-tools-use-readdir-instead-of-deprecated-readdir_r.patch
queue-4.4/perf-thread_map-correctly-size-buffer-used-with-dirent-dt_name.patch
queue-4.4/perf-tests-remove-wrong-semicolon-in-while-loop-in-cqm-test.patch
queue-4.4/perf-annotate-browser-fix-behaviour-of-shift-tab-with-nothing-focussed.patch
queue-4.4/perf-tests-avoid-possible-truncation-with-dirent-d_name-snprintf.patch
queue-4.4/perf-top-use-__fallthrough.patch
queue-4.4/perf-scripting-perl-fix-compile-error-with-some-perl5-versions.patch
queue-4.4/perf-bench-numa-avoid-possible-truncation-when-using-snprintf.patch
queue-4.4/perf-tools-use-readdir-instead-of-deprecated-readdir_r-again.patch
queue-4.4/perf-thread_map-use-readdir-instead-of-deprecated-readdir_r.patch
queue-4.4/perf-tools-remove-duplicate-const-qualifier.patch
queue-4.4/tools-string-use-__fallthrough-in-perf_atoll.patch
queue-4.4/perf-intel-pt-use-__fallthrough.patch
queue-4.4/perf-script-use-readdir-instead-of-deprecated-readdir_r.patch
queue-4.4/tools-include-add-a-__fallthrough-statement.patch
queue-4.4/tools-strfilter-use-__fallthrough.patch
queue-4.4/perf-dwarf-guard-x86_64-definitions-under-ifdef-else-clause.patch
queue-4.4/perf-pmu-fix-misleadingly-indented-assignment-whitespace.patch
queue-4.4/perf-trace-do-not-process-perf_record_lost-twice.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-07-13 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=149995097217991@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.