From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E015B2DE6EA; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:25:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754904325; cv=none; b=TnC2JV6gVgHy0MT0kiGTAlZRPCQfiTirWD+sNFd6Uzzyzf60Z2va5vSwBvdkUNTc9x1dxZM3roBDKkT8Dp2wup5W4yuM0al4ByTidCLXPoa6Mms0mTwuIpEqwqu1iqZ7UAJ0JxTB5uCXMrMkVMSMx6h1n9wl+TT8lQOnLt1mx3g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754904325; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lWtl+L7pWB/ulDbxs60HArk76e5ZiDbUJoN+I5NpWjs=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=mPFrvHPKzaTO30+pC9tTDNQHsxM4/xR2bcriwDG3NfarM6dHC4vzuagKZ8l4t6Xqc/83tNVXX7v/4CCOy1XjVrb2m7Pd5vKXDpDM5WuRgw/rI9AgzwbcdJlCZex3ki0wbllGhCV2YTYa9uA1HtOqTw8JyuJsyf4F2rnyTTmy1gc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=HoeJ03P8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="HoeJ03P8" Received: from pps.filterd (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 57AJpKDB029406; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:24:56 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=nBod5i xELVIKNb+CTdPVWWnjYnpuicSAFr5e0+Tswvw=; b=HoeJ03P8IoHBXlHcUnWdSr Uv87ziiUILXUOFiNHMwr5Ot54yZ2+RYp5Yu8gnEF+AfnQj/v2nkB4s7cf782lwWf j9iFiZd+/Mm9+1W0FiC+V1F7QG8CIt+Rhhekm+sCEe029NEvnAJEJn/khLoPFMu9 sTkaQuGn37Gj5n7z9t3ZjXISJgH/6QCew9IeOdjEYrkyGsutNti3/4Nb06qjKqF2 BV5HsgaBPjhUwH1GirqTNREJcOynZ2Gi2kllpKbrVcCLq/KrxKjpAB/Ipj3ifuv8 hM2jzzuhDmnYSd72/1oMlfxgaAF0OSThkEr71ALnEer1n6BSX802PsTxBh0W0Ujg == Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 48eha9vt76-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:24:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0360072.ppops.net (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.1.12/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 57B9MHAi004456; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:24:55 GMT Received: from ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dc.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.220]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 48eha9vt74-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:24:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 57B98D27010656; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:24:54 GMT Received: from smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.226]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 48egnudd7s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:24:54 +0000 Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.104]) by smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 57B9OphO52887852 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:24:51 GMT Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3F020043; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:24:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A0620040; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:24:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.152.224.240] (unknown [9.152.224.240]) by smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:24:50 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <14ec76a2-e80e-44a8-a775-ebd4668959c4@linux.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:24:50 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] net/smc: fix UAF on smcsk after smc_listen_out() To: "D. Wythe" Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, pabeni@redhat.com, song@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, yhs@fb.com, edumazet@google.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, Mahanta.Jambigi@ibm.com, Sidraya.Jayagond@ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, dust.li@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, guwen@linux.alibaba.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jaka@linux.ibm.com References: <20250731084240.86550-1-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> <20250731084240.86550-3-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> <174ccf57-6e7c-4dab-8743-33989829de01@linux.ibm.com> <20250811015452.GB19346@j66a10360.sqa.eu95> Content-Language: en-US From: Alexandra Winter In-Reply-To: <20250811015452.GB19346@j66a10360.sqa.eu95> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=KPRaDEFo c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6899b6e8 cx=c_pps a=bLidbwmWQ0KltjZqbj+ezA==:117 a=bLidbwmWQ0KltjZqbj+ezA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=2OwXVqhp2XgA:10 a=RdrFP3df893paWRMMkAA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: kspH_iWLfHuDQMYyBY6nEisN5QjgiFIL X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUwODExMDA2MiBTYWx0ZWRfX7hl4qGc+4f97 0gMUFZUVcB05sCVzkfhBIRkjBT54FVcY4aKKuPsW/G0DEsXm8ub5FnyHx+PJFBWcCTskdkmkncR PpMPbeNKtbpO7xgzDIdShMwLnzyJP8Ryz9LQRpo/M3GsAUd6F4YsLnDhbSEOlq52MBsMRDJu11g bEvvvehEbdM6JRClmMiMKuJj1TWAxsafbpL+Yqk2jf/Qny6/Szvfulmb7H7P6tCl63OmpGp9vGm r44I20cgRdZzcTRrWEYkzqR5B/yP82NmEmK4cyZLyAihHFnAp6UvMVjC3Hy9HmXFAPR8w7a1nnE o7c4CvkoNFWMjA+qTkFn3Y8HVsqH8RKMjYVfc3/yfJ4In+hGCVR4gsyXiiw02GgDWp2lGCvikJJ k7cFfkn2b+BDR95Tlor1CccuzqLz84sV1Iov7W9AGjOsH1ZjFVuwV4BOC+4d27DxeyEJabee X-Proofpoint-GUID: aPsa-QizwhW6HZKV5RzAJ6nky6wU5Q3y X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1099,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.80.40 definitions=2025-08-11_01,2025-08-06_01,2025-03-28_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=698 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam authscore=0 authtc=n/a authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2507300000 definitions=main-2508110062 On 11.08.25 03:54, D. Wythe wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 02:57:31PM +0200, Alexandra Winter wrote: >> >> >> On 31.07.25 10:42, D. Wythe wrote: >>> BPF CI testing report a UAF issue: >>> >> [..] >> >> As this is a problem fix, you could send it directly to 'net' >> instead of including it to this series. >> > > Hi Alexandra, > > Yes, it should be sent to net. But the problem is that if I don't carry > this patch, the BPF CI test will always crash. Maybe I should send a > copy to both net and bpf-next? Do you have any suggestions? > > Best wishes, > D. Wythe I do not have any experience with bpf-next. But typically patches to 'net' are taken after one or two days, if there are no issues. I'd assume they are then picked to net-next and bpf-next(?) almost instantly. Then you would not need it in your bpf series anymore. Sending a patch to two different mailing lists in parallel sounds like a bad idea to me.