From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 44CC4E00C2E; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:38:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [192.55.52.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC16E00C2E for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:38:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jul 2017 07:38:13 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,374,1496127600"; d="scan'208";a="879719619" Received: from lsandov1-mobl2.zpn.intel.com ([10.219.128.119]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jul 2017 07:38:12 -0700 Message-ID: <1500302882.5349.110.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Leonardo Sandoval To: "Burton, Ross" Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:48:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <1500278455-5712-1-git-send-email-pierre.ficheux@smile.fr> <1500300247.5349.105.camel@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added missing CPPFLAGS/CFLAGS/LDFLAGS in sample recipe for morty branch X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:38:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 15:30 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 17 July 2017 at 15:04, Leonardo Sandoval > wrote: > master has the second line (LDFLAGS) but not the first one > (CPPFLAGS and > CFLAGS) so the problem may also be present on master. Would > you mind > checking this and sent patches to the poky mailing list? > > > The GNU_HASH warning is triggered by ignoring LDFLAGS. Got it, so definitely LDFLAGS var is missing, not sure if the rest are necessary for this simple hello world recipe. Leo > > > Ross