From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rsnd: remove unnecessary static in rsnd_ssiu_probe()
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:31:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1500309096.25934.11.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170717153020.GA19704@embeddedgus>
On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 10:30 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Remove unnecessary static on local variable ops.
> Such variable is initialized before being used,
> on every execution path throughout the function.
> The static has no benefit and, removing it reduces
> the code size.
[]
> In the following log you can see the difference in the code size. Also,
> there is a significant difference in the bss segment. This log is the
> output of the size command, before and after the code change:
>
> before:
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 3211 680 64 3955 f73 sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.o
>
> after:
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 3207 592 0 3799 ed7 sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.o
[]
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.c b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.c
[]
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ int rsnd_ssiu_probe(struct rsnd_priv *priv)
> {
> struct device *dev = rsnd_priv_to_dev(priv);
> struct rsnd_ssiu *ssiu;
> - static struct rsnd_mod_ops *ops;
> + struct rsnd_mod_ops *ops;
> int i, nr, ret;
>
> /* same number to SSI */
I'm not an sh user anymore, but it's curious to me why
the static removal has such a large impact on data size.
Is this for an allyesconfig with debug symbols?
btw: this does compile for x86 and those sizes seem
more sensible.
$ size sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.o* text data bss dec hex filename
1950 248 0 2198 896 sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.o.defconfig.new
1950 248 8 2206 89e sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.o.defconfig.old
2692 248 0 2940 b7c sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.o.allyesconfig.new
2692 248 8 2948 b84 sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssiu.o.allyesconfig.old
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-17 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-17 15:30 [PATCH] ASoC: rsnd: remove unnecessary static in rsnd_ssiu_probe() Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-07-17 16:31 ` Joe Perches [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1500309096.25934.11.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.