All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com,
	Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 2/7] perf/x86/intel: Record branch type
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 20:13:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1500379995-6449-3-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1500379995-6449-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>

Perf already has support for disassembling the branch instruction
and using the branch type for filtering. The patch just records
the branch type in perf_branch_entry.

Before recording, the patch converts the x86 branch type to
common branch type.

Change log
----------
v10: Set the branch_map array to be static. The previous version
     has it on stack then makes the compiler to create it every
     time when the function gets called.

v9: Use __ffs() to find first bit in type in common_branch_type().
    It lets the code be clear.

v8: Change PERF_BR_NONE to PERF_BR_UNKNOWN.

v7: Just convert following x86 branch types to common branch types.

X86_BR_CALL      -> PERF_BR_CALL
X86_BR_RET       -> PERF_BR_RET
X86_BR_JCC       -> PERF_BR_COND
X86_BR_JMP       -> PERF_BR_UNCOND
X86_BR_IND_CALL  -> PERF_BR_IND_CALL
X86_BR_ZERO_CALL -> PERF_BR_CALL
X86_BR_IND_JMP   -> PERF_BR_IND
X86_BR_SYSCALL   -> PERF_BR_SYSCALL
X86_BR_SYSRET    -> PERF_BR_SYSRET

Others are set to PERF_BR_NONE

v6: Not changed.

v5: Just fix the merge error. No other update.

v4: Comparing to previous version, the major changes are:

1. Uses a lookup table to convert x86 branch type to common branch
   type.

2. Move the JCC forward/JCC backward and cross page computing to
   user space.

3. Initialize branch type to 0 in intel_pmu_lbr_read_32 and
   intel_pmu_lbr_read_64

Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index eb26165..0edda48 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ enum {
 	X86_BR_ZERO_CALL	= 1 << 15,/* zero length call */
 	X86_BR_CALL_STACK	= 1 << 16,/* call stack */
 	X86_BR_IND_JMP		= 1 << 17,/* indirect jump */
+
+	X86_BR_TYPE_SAVE	= 1 << 18,/* indicate to save branch type */
+
 };
 
 #define X86_BR_PLM (X86_BR_USER | X86_BR_KERNEL)
@@ -510,6 +513,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].in_tx	= 0;
 		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].abort	= 0;
 		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].cycles	= 0;
+		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].type	= 0;
 		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].reserved	= 0;
 	}
 	cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = i;
@@ -596,6 +600,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].in_tx	 = in_tx;
 		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].abort	 = abort;
 		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].cycles	 = cycles;
+		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].type	 = 0;
 		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].reserved	 = 0;
 		out++;
 	}
@@ -673,6 +678,10 @@ static int intel_pmu_setup_sw_lbr_filter(struct perf_event *event)
 
 	if (br_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL)
 		mask |= X86_BR_CALL | X86_BR_ZERO_CALL;
+
+	if (br_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE)
+		mask |= X86_BR_TYPE_SAVE;
+
 	/*
 	 * stash actual user request into reg, it may
 	 * be used by fixup code for some CPU
@@ -926,6 +935,43 @@ static int branch_type(unsigned long from, unsigned long to, int abort)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+#define X86_BR_TYPE_MAP_MAX	16
+
+static int branch_map[X86_BR_TYPE_MAP_MAX] = {
+	PERF_BR_CALL,		/* X86_BR_CALL */
+	PERF_BR_RET,		/* X86_BR_RET */
+	PERF_BR_SYSCALL,	/* X86_BR_SYSCALL */
+	PERF_BR_SYSRET,		/* X86_BR_SYSRET */
+	PERF_BR_UNKNOWN,	/* X86_BR_INT */
+	PERF_BR_UNKNOWN,	/* X86_BR_IRET */
+	PERF_BR_COND,		/* X86_BR_JCC */
+	PERF_BR_UNCOND,		/* X86_BR_JMP */
+	PERF_BR_UNKNOWN,	/* X86_BR_IRQ */
+	PERF_BR_IND_CALL,	/* X86_BR_IND_CALL */
+	PERF_BR_UNKNOWN,	/* X86_BR_ABORT */
+	PERF_BR_UNKNOWN,	/* X86_BR_IN_TX */
+	PERF_BR_UNKNOWN,	/* X86_BR_NO_TX */
+	PERF_BR_CALL,		/* X86_BR_ZERO_CALL */
+	PERF_BR_UNKNOWN,	/* X86_BR_CALL_STACK */
+	PERF_BR_IND,		/* X86_BR_IND_JMP */
+};
+
+static int
+common_branch_type(int type)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	type >>= 2; /* skip X86_BR_USER and X86_BR_KERNEL */
+
+	if (type) {
+		i = __ffs(type);
+		if (i < X86_BR_TYPE_MAP_MAX)
+			return branch_map[i];
+	}
+
+	return PERF_BR_UNKNOWN;
+}
+
 /*
  * implement actual branch filter based on user demand.
  * Hardware may not exactly satisfy that request, thus
@@ -942,7 +988,8 @@ intel_pmu_lbr_filter(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 	bool compress = false;
 
 	/* if sampling all branches, then nothing to filter */
-	if ((br_sel & X86_BR_ALL) == X86_BR_ALL)
+	if (((br_sel & X86_BR_ALL) == X86_BR_ALL) &&
+	    ((br_sel & X86_BR_TYPE_SAVE) != X86_BR_TYPE_SAVE))
 		return;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < cpuc->lbr_stack.nr; i++) {
@@ -963,6 +1010,9 @@ intel_pmu_lbr_filter(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 			cpuc->lbr_entries[i].from = 0;
 			compress = true;
 		}
+
+		if ((br_sel & X86_BR_TYPE_SAVE) == X86_BR_TYPE_SAVE)
+			cpuc->lbr_entries[i].type = common_branch_type(type);
 	}
 
 	if (!compress)
-- 
2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-18  4:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-18 12:13 [PATCH v10 0/7] perf report: Show branch type Jin Yao
2017-07-18 12:13 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] perf/core: Define the common branch type classification Jin Yao
2017-07-18  9:31   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-07-18 15:54     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-20  9:03   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2017-07-18 12:13 ` Jin Yao [this message]
2017-07-20  9:04   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Record branch type tip-bot for Jin Yao
2017-07-18 12:13 ` [PATCH v10 3/7] perf record: Create a new option save_type in --branch-filter Jin Yao
2017-07-20  9:04   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2017-07-18 12:13 ` [PATCH v10 4/7] perf report: Refactor the branch info printing code Jin Yao
2017-07-20  9:04   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2017-07-18 12:13 ` [PATCH v10 5/7] perf util: Create branch.c/.h for common branch functions Jin Yao
2017-07-20  9:05   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2017-07-18 12:13 ` [PATCH v10 6/7] perf report: Show branch type statistics for stdio mode Jin Yao
2017-07-20  9:05   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2017-07-18 12:13 ` [PATCH v10 7/7] perf report: Show branch type in callchain entry Jin Yao
2017-07-20  9:05   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1500379995-6449-3-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.