From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59572) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXg5g-0001JJ-Up for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 23:56:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXg5d-0007IF-QT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 23:56:00 -0400 Message-ID: <1500436532.3350.8.camel@kernel.crashing.org> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:55:32 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20170719030053.GP3140@umbus.fritz.box> References: <1499274819-15607-1-git-send-email-clg@kaod.org> <20170719030053.GP3140@umbus.fritz.box> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/26] guest exploitation of the XIVE interrupt controller (POWER9) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Gibson , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric?= Le Goater Cc: Alexander Graf , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 13:00 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > So, this is probably obvious, but I'm not considering this a candidate > for qemu 2.10 (seeing as the soft freeze was yesterday). I'll still > try to review and, once ready, queue for 2.11. Right. I need to review still and we need to make sure we have the right plumbing for migration etc... and of course I need to do the KVM bits. So it's definitely not 2.10 material. Cheers, Ben.