From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Wilck Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] multipath-tools/libmultipath: Add args min_avg_latency for path_latency. Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 14:22:34 +0200 Message-ID: <1500639754.32663.24.camel@suse.de> References: <1500521767-15884-1-git-send-email-philip.yang@huawei.com> <1500521767-15884-3-git-send-email-philip.yang@huawei.com> <1500574041.32663.7.camel@suse.com> <5737cdc5-88fa-b27a-3acb-eacf1b4b0341@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5737cdc5-88fa-b27a-3acb-eacf1b4b0341@huawei.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Yang Feng , dm-devel@redhat.com, xose.vazquez@gmail.com Cc: zouming.zouming@huawei.com, hege09@huawei.com, guanjunxiong@huawei.com, shenhong09@huawei.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids Dear Yang, On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 11:38 +0800, Yang Feng wrote: > > Sorry, I don't find this similar syntax. Could you give a example of > the > other prioritizer. Please look at the prio_args section in multipath.conf. "weighted" uses just space separated args. "iet" uses "parm=value" syntax. That's actually most intuitive IMO. No current prio algorithm uses anything but space to separate options. Regards Martin --