All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Marc Haber <mh+netdev@zugschlus.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: After a while of system running no incoming UDP any more?
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:07:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1501229277.2597.1.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170728062644.bp7agcf6bh7g6yfw@torres.zugschlus.de>

Hi,

On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 08:26 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 04:19:10PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > Once that a system enter the buggy status, do the packets reach the
> > relevant socket's queue?
> > 
> > ss -u
> > nstat |grep -e Udp -e Ip
> > 
> > will help checking that.
> 
> I now have the issue on one machine, a Xen guest acting as authoritative
> nameserver for my domains. Here are the outputs during normal use, with
> artificial queries coming in on eth0:
> 
> [9/1075]mh@impetus:~ $ ss -u
> Recv-Q Send-Q                                     Local Address:Port                                                      Peer Address:Port                
> 0      0                                              127.0.0.1:56547                                                        127.0.0.1:domain               
> 0      0                                         216.231.132.60:27667                                                       198.41.0.4:domain               
> 0      0                                         216.231.132.60:44121                                                          8.8.8.8:domain               
> 0      0                                         216.231.132.60:29814                                                       198.41.0.4:domain               
> [10/1076]mh@impetus:~ $ ss -u
> Recv-Q Send-Q                                     Local Address:Port                                                      Peer Address:Port                
> [11/1076]mh@impetus:~ $ ss -u
> Recv-Q Send-Q                                     Local Address:Port                                                      Peer Address:Port                
> [12/1076]mh@impetus:~ $ ss -u
> Recv-Q Send-Q                                     Local Address:Port                                                      Peer Address:Port                
> [13/1076]mh@impetus:~ $ ss -u
> Recv-Q Send-Q                                     Local Address:Port                                                      Peer Address:Port                
> [14/1076]mh@impetus:~ $ nstat  | grep -e Udp -e Ip
> IpInReceives                    400688             0.0
> IpInAddrErrors                  18567              0.0
> IpInUnknownProtos               3                  0.0
> IpInDelivers                    330634             0.0
> IpOutRequests                   283637             0.0
> UdpInDatagrams                  145860             0.0
> UdpNoPorts                      1313               0.0
> UdpInErrors                     9356               0.0

Thanks for the info. This is compatible with what reported on:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196469

and should be fixed by this patch:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=150115960024825&w=2

(approval pending)

Ad a workaround you can disable UDP early demux:

echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/udp_early_demux

(will affect both ipv4 and ipv6).

and (if the system  is already into the bad state) increase the udp
accounted memory limit, writing in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/udp_mem greater
values than the current ones (the actual values depends on the system
total memory).

Feel free to test the above patch on your systems.

Cheers,

Paolo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-28  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-24 12:09 After a while of system running no incoming UDP any more? Marc Haber
2017-07-24 14:19 ` Paolo Abeni
2017-07-25 11:57   ` Marc Haber
2017-07-25 12:17     ` Paolo Abeni
2017-07-26  8:10       ` Marc Haber
2017-07-26  8:33         ` Paolo Abeni
2017-07-28  6:26   ` Marc Haber
2017-07-28  8:05     ` Eric Dumazet
2017-07-28  8:15       ` Paolo Abeni
2017-07-28  8:41         ` Eric Dumazet
2017-07-28  8:07     ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2017-07-28 12:14       ` Marc Haber
2017-08-11 14:34         ` Marc Haber
2017-08-11 20:07           ` Marc Haber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1501229277.2597.1.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=mh+netdev@zugschlus.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.