From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: Architecture Board Proposal Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:43:06 +0100 Message-ID: <1502184.oKzFkHpXjH@xps13> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674488A2@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B29F8E82 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:44:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmeg8 with SMTP id g8so27307251wme.1 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:44:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674488A2@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Tim, 2015-10-29 15:21, O'Driscoll, Tim: > Scope > ----- > Issues that are within the scope of the Architecture Board include: > - Project scope/charter. What is and isn't within the scope of the project? What happens if somebody wants to upstream a new library/capability and it's not clear whether it fits within DPDK or not? As a random example, if somebody wanted to upstream a DPDK-enabled TCP/IP stack to dpdk.org, should that be accepted or rejected? Do you mean the scope of this board would be about the whole projects hosted on dpdk.org (http://dpdk.org/browse/) or only the DPDK (http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk)? Using your TCP stack example, I think it should be hosted on dpdk.org but it may be out of the scope of the DPDK tree.