From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: mjurczyk@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mszeredi@redhat.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "fuse: initialize the flock flag in fuse_file on allocation" has been added to the 3.18-stable tree
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 15:18:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <150266271988174@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
fuse: initialize the flock flag in fuse_file on allocation
to the 3.18-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
fuse-initialize-the-flock-flag-in-fuse_file-on-allocation.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.18 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 68227c03cba84a24faf8a7277d2b1a03c8959c2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mateusz Jurczyk <mjurczyk@google.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 12:26:49 +0200
Subject: fuse: initialize the flock flag in fuse_file on allocation
From: Mateusz Jurczyk <mjurczyk@google.com>
commit 68227c03cba84a24faf8a7277d2b1a03c8959c2c upstream.
Before the patch, the flock flag could remain uninitialized for the
lifespan of the fuse_file allocation. Unless set to true in
fuse_file_flock(), it would remain in an indeterminate state until read in
an if statement in fuse_release_common(). This could consequently lead to
taking an unexpected branch in the code.
The bug was discovered by a runtime instrumentation designed to detect use
of uninitialized memory in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Jurczyk <mjurczyk@google.com>
Fixes: 37fb3a30b462 ("fuse: fix flock")
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/fuse/file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ struct fuse_file *fuse_file_alloc(struct
{
struct fuse_file *ff;
- ff = kmalloc(sizeof(struct fuse_file), GFP_KERNEL);
+ ff = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fuse_file), GFP_KERNEL);
if (unlikely(!ff))
return NULL;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from mjurczyk@google.com are
queue-3.18/fuse-initialize-the-flock-flag-in-fuse_file-on-allocation.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-08-14 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=150266271988174@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mjurczyk@google.com \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.