From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org, acme@kernel.org, eranian@gmail.com,
luto@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, vincent.weaver@maine.edu
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] perf/x86: Fix RDPMC vs. mm_struct tracking" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 11:52:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1503255142116131@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From bfe334924ccd9f4a53f30240c03cf2f43f5b2df1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 19:39:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86: Fix RDPMC vs. mm_struct tracking
Vince reported the following rdpmc() testcase failure:
> Failing test case:
>
> fd=perf_event_open();
> addr=mmap(fd);
> exec() // without closing or unmapping the event
> fd=perf_event_open();
> addr=mmap(fd);
> rdpmc() // GPFs due to rdpmc being disabled
The problem is of course that exec() plays tricks with what is
current->mm, only destroying the old mappings after having
installed the new mm.
Fix this confusion by passing along vma->vm_mm instead of relying on
current->mm.
Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Tested-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 1e0fb9ec679c ("perf: Add pmu callbacks to track event mapping and unmapping")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170802173930.cstykcqefmqt7jau@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
[ Minor cleanups. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 8e3db8f642a7..af12e294caed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -2114,7 +2114,7 @@ static void refresh_pce(void *ignored)
load_mm_cr4(this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm));
}
-static void x86_pmu_event_mapped(struct perf_event *event)
+static void x86_pmu_event_mapped(struct perf_event *event, struct mm_struct *mm)
{
if (!(event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_RDPMC_ALLOWED))
return;
@@ -2129,22 +2129,20 @@ static void x86_pmu_event_mapped(struct perf_event *event)
* For now, this can't happen because all callers hold mmap_sem
* for write. If this changes, we'll need a different solution.
*/
- lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
+ lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&mm->mmap_sem);
- if (atomic_inc_return(¤t->mm->context.perf_rdpmc_allowed) == 1)
- on_each_cpu_mask(mm_cpumask(current->mm), refresh_pce, NULL, 1);
+ if (atomic_inc_return(&mm->context.perf_rdpmc_allowed) == 1)
+ on_each_cpu_mask(mm_cpumask(mm), refresh_pce, NULL, 1);
}
-static void x86_pmu_event_unmapped(struct perf_event *event)
+static void x86_pmu_event_unmapped(struct perf_event *event, struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- if (!current->mm)
- return;
if (!(event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_RDPMC_ALLOWED))
return;
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(¤t->mm->context.perf_rdpmc_allowed))
- on_each_cpu_mask(mm_cpumask(current->mm), refresh_pce, NULL, 1);
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mm->context.perf_rdpmc_allowed))
+ on_each_cpu_mask(mm_cpumask(mm), refresh_pce, NULL, 1);
}
static int x86_pmu_event_idx(struct perf_event *event)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index a3b873fc59e4..b14095bcf4bb 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -310,8 +310,8 @@ struct pmu {
* Notification that the event was mapped or unmapped. Called
* in the context of the mapping task.
*/
- void (*event_mapped) (struct perf_event *event); /*optional*/
- void (*event_unmapped) (struct perf_event *event); /*optional*/
+ void (*event_mapped) (struct perf_event *event, struct mm_struct *mm); /* optional */
+ void (*event_unmapped) (struct perf_event *event, struct mm_struct *mm); /* optional */
/*
* Flags for ->add()/->del()/ ->start()/->stop(). There are
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 426c2ffba16d..a654b8a3586f 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -5090,7 +5090,7 @@ static void perf_mmap_open(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
atomic_inc(&event->rb->aux_mmap_count);
if (event->pmu->event_mapped)
- event->pmu->event_mapped(event);
+ event->pmu->event_mapped(event, vma->vm_mm);
}
static void perf_pmu_output_stop(struct perf_event *event);
@@ -5113,7 +5113,7 @@ static void perf_mmap_close(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
unsigned long size = perf_data_size(rb);
if (event->pmu->event_unmapped)
- event->pmu->event_unmapped(event);
+ event->pmu->event_unmapped(event, vma->vm_mm);
/*
* rb->aux_mmap_count will always drop before rb->mmap_count and
@@ -5411,7 +5411,7 @@ aux_unlock:
vma->vm_ops = &perf_mmap_vmops;
if (event->pmu->event_mapped)
- event->pmu->event_mapped(event);
+ event->pmu->event_mapped(event, vma->vm_mm);
return ret;
}
reply other threads:[~2017-08-20 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1503255142116131@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=eranian@gmail.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.