From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161])
	by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C64C782FD
	for <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:29:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id
	v7L9Tl7g017457
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128
	verify=NOT); Mon, 21 Aug 2017 10:29:48 +0100
Message-ID: <1503307787.32591.59.camel@linuxfoundation.org>
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 10:29:47 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CA+chaQcQNkYbnSpVzA5xceo=CTpWDnKd8n3WaZM6zbUOe5m_XA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+chaQc_oKOja+s54Ku-sCQqxdrqi8d16Dkj2=dJHofYnOR1xA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1502969638.13978.209.camel@linuxfoundation.org>
	<CA+chaQcZKA=x1_O88h=Akjh=Cr2Rtt_8GqgRrm61fuLnT_myRw@mail.gmail.com>
	<d2851cd0-1a15-f5aa-1e9b-dda654978178@linux.intel.com>
	<CAMKF1sryybJQXYvkQVbSEciBhYY1s7Xc-k+qhFJSRbbRxi1DJQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<fe1575c3-4e74-1a5d-b48e-86c6908b2e63@linux.intel.com>
	<CAMKF1soQw0VVy0RKe4w-qsCwPh_OTgatYLrx6mPpapBGooy-Ew@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+chaQcQNkYbnSpVzA5xceo=CTpWDnKd8n3WaZM6zbUOe5m_XA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.11
	(dan.rpsys.net [192.168.3.1]);
	Mon, 21 Aug 2017 10:29:48 +0100 (BST)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at dan
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: openssl10 unusable for many components
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:29:49 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 19:29 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> Even with that patch to rename openssl10 back to openssl we still
> need to solve the openssl-native which wasn't reverted back to 1.0.
> 
> Upstream nodejs isn't going to be openssl-1.1 for a bit longer as
> explained:
> https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14761
> https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11828
> so it would make sense to revert native and nativesdk versions as
> well - if it isn't done in oe-core, I'll do it in our own layers to
> keep the builds going.

Hopefully we have a working 'revert' back to 1.0 in master now as there
was simply too much breakage for this release.

I would ask that people do try and figure out how to solve some of the
1.1 issues in the meantime, hopefully people can enable 1.1 with some
PREFERRED_VERSION tweaks.

Cheers,

Richard