From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2746782B3 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 19:55:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id v7MJts5v028481 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 22 Aug 2017 20:55:55 +0100 Message-ID: <1503431754.32591.130.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Andre McCurdy , "Huang, Jie (Jackie)" Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 20:55:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20170822074219.8490-1-jackie.huang@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.11 (dan.rpsys.net [192.168.3.1]); Tue, 22 Aug 2017 20:55:55 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at dan X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: OE Core mailing list Subject: Re: [PATCH] boost: add python to default PACKAGECONFIG options X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 19:55:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 12:51 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:42 AM,   > wrote: > > > > From: Jackie Huang > > > > We want to provide python libs by default, and some other > > popular Linux distributions like redhat/fedora does the same. > Has something changed? Is there anything in oe-core or meta-oe which > now needs boost python support enabled? Does it even actually build on all arches? I'm rather behind with patch review right now as people are putting so many patches out there with what seems like minimal testing and expecting me/Ross and the autobuilder to figure out the problems for them. Each time one fails, it blocks the queue with the rest of them in and I have to retest until I get something clean. Testing this change is quite a way down my priority list I'm afraid. Cheers, Richard