All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1503501161.2484.3.camel@wdc.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 7fa6a40..706b5b4 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,15 +1,12 @@
-On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 19:35 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
-> soft lockup still can be observed easily with patch d4acf3650c7c(
-> block: Make blk_mq_delay_kick_requeue_list() rerun the queue at a quiet time),
-> but no hard lockup.
-
-Hello Ming,
-
-I never claimed that commit d4acf3650c7c was a full solution to avoid these
-soft lockups. I assume these results mean that patch series "[PATCH 0/7]
-Device mapper and dm-mpath fixes" was not applied to the kernel used in your
-tests? A colleague of you has reported that that patch series is sufficient
-to avoid these soft lockups. See also
-https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2017-August/msg00122.html.
-
-Bart.
+T24gV2VkLCAyMDE3LTA4LTIzIGF0IDE5OjM1ICswODAwLCBNaW5nIExlaSB3cm90ZToNCj4gc29m
+dCBsb2NrdXAgc3RpbGwgY2FuIGJlIG9ic2VydmVkIGVhc2lseSB3aXRoIHBhdGNoIGQ0YWNmMzY1
+MGM3YygNCj4gYmxvY2s6IE1ha2UgYmxrX21xX2RlbGF5X2tpY2tfcmVxdWV1ZV9saXN0KCkgcmVy
+dW4gdGhlIHF1ZXVlIGF0IGEgcXVpZXQgdGltZSksDQo+IGJ1dCBubyBoYXJkIGxvY2t1cC4NCg0K
+SGVsbG8gTWluZywNCg0KSSBuZXZlciBjbGFpbWVkIHRoYXQgY29tbWl0IGQ0YWNmMzY1MGM3YyB3
+YXMgYSBmdWxsIHNvbHV0aW9uIHRvIGF2b2lkIHRoZXNlDQpzb2Z0IGxvY2t1cHMuIEkgYXNzdW1l
+IHRoZXNlIHJlc3VsdHMgbWVhbiB0aGF0IHBhdGNoIHNlcmllcyAiW1BBVENIIDAvN10NCkRldmlj
+ZSBtYXBwZXIgYW5kIGRtLW1wYXRoIGZpeGVzIiB3YXMgbm90IGFwcGxpZWQgdG8gdGhlIGtlcm5l
+bCB1c2VkIGluIHlvdXINCnRlc3RzPyBBIGNvbGxlYWd1ZSBvZiB5b3UgaGFzIHJlcG9ydGVkIHRo
+YXQgdGhhdCBwYXRjaCBzZXJpZXMgaXMgc3VmZmljaWVudA0KdG8gYXZvaWQgdGhlc2Ugc29mdCBs
+b2NrdXBzLiBTZWUgYWxzbw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmVkaGF0LmNvbS9hcmNoaXZlcy9kbS1kZXZl
+bC8yMDE3LUF1Z3VzdC9tc2cwMDEyMi5odG1sLg0KDQpCYXJ0Lg==
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index faa4f6b..530c9db 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -14,20 +14,17 @@
  " loberman@redhat.com <loberman@redhat.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 19:35 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:\n"
- "> soft lockup still can be observed easily with patch d4acf3650c7c(\n"
- "> block: Make blk_mq_delay_kick_requeue_list() rerun the queue at a quiet time),\n"
- "> but no hard lockup.\n"
- "\n"
- "Hello Ming,\n"
- "\n"
- "I never claimed that commit d4acf3650c7c was a full solution to avoid these\n"
- "soft lockups. I assume these results mean that patch series \"[PATCH 0/7]\n"
- "Device mapper and dm-mpath fixes\" was not applied to the kernel used in your\n"
- "tests? A colleague of you has reported that that patch series is sufficient\n"
- "to avoid these soft lockups. See also\n"
- "https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2017-August/msg00122.html.\n"
- "\n"
- Bart.
+ "T24gV2VkLCAyMDE3LTA4LTIzIGF0IDE5OjM1ICswODAwLCBNaW5nIExlaSB3cm90ZToNCj4gc29m\n"
+ "dCBsb2NrdXAgc3RpbGwgY2FuIGJlIG9ic2VydmVkIGVhc2lseSB3aXRoIHBhdGNoIGQ0YWNmMzY1\n"
+ "MGM3YygNCj4gYmxvY2s6IE1ha2UgYmxrX21xX2RlbGF5X2tpY2tfcmVxdWV1ZV9saXN0KCkgcmVy\n"
+ "dW4gdGhlIHF1ZXVlIGF0IGEgcXVpZXQgdGltZSksDQo+IGJ1dCBubyBoYXJkIGxvY2t1cC4NCg0K\n"
+ "SGVsbG8gTWluZywNCg0KSSBuZXZlciBjbGFpbWVkIHRoYXQgY29tbWl0IGQ0YWNmMzY1MGM3YyB3\n"
+ "YXMgYSBmdWxsIHNvbHV0aW9uIHRvIGF2b2lkIHRoZXNlDQpzb2Z0IGxvY2t1cHMuIEkgYXNzdW1l\n"
+ "IHRoZXNlIHJlc3VsdHMgbWVhbiB0aGF0IHBhdGNoIHNlcmllcyAiW1BBVENIIDAvN10NCkRldmlj\n"
+ "ZSBtYXBwZXIgYW5kIGRtLW1wYXRoIGZpeGVzIiB3YXMgbm90IGFwcGxpZWQgdG8gdGhlIGtlcm5l\n"
+ "bCB1c2VkIGluIHlvdXINCnRlc3RzPyBBIGNvbGxlYWd1ZSBvZiB5b3UgaGFzIHJlcG9ydGVkIHRo\n"
+ "YXQgdGhhdCBwYXRjaCBzZXJpZXMgaXMgc3VmZmljaWVudA0KdG8gYXZvaWQgdGhlc2Ugc29mdCBs\n"
+ "b2NrdXBzLiBTZWUgYWxzbw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmVkaGF0LmNvbS9hcmNoaXZlcy9kbS1kZXZl\n"
+ bC8yMDE3LUF1Z3VzdC9tc2cwMDEyMi5odG1sLg0KDQpCYXJ0Lg==
 
-3fe07daf8b81d136eee1afdc2e76449babd82b5c858cadae361af261fbf64413
+c7732dcb457b0e3b99d8a1f106a89841b37b5eec8edfd1b4651134bd4a787972

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.