Re: [PATCH 0/2] Yocto Compatible 2.0 support code

[Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>]

On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 10:12 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> I also get for all recipes (i.e. the error is in the base
> configuration):
> 
> meta/conf/bitbake.conf:752: include/require/inherit "conf/target/${TARGET_SYS}.conf" resulted in including "conf/target/x86_64-oe-linux.conf" while parsing. Variables effecting the parameter changed later such that "conf/target/x86_64-refkit-linux.conf" would have been included at the end of the recipe.
> 
> None of these two files exist, so it doesn't make a difference. But is
> it really intended that a conf/target/${TARGET_SYS}.conf gets included
> that isn't the one for the final TARGET_SYS? That looks like a genuine
> bug to me.

And Andre McCurdy also came to the same conclusion - see his
"[OE-core] [PATCH] bitbake.conf: fix ineffective include conf/target/${TARGET_SYS}.conf"
patch. However, that patch IMHO is incomplete, because it doesn't account for
${DISTRO}.conf changing the TARGET_VENDOR part of TARGET_SYS. I'll comment there, too.

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.