All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org, chuhu@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ring-buffer: Have ring_buffer_alloc_read_page() return error on offline CPU" has been added to the 4.12-stable tree
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 14:54:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <150383849910889@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ring-buffer: Have ring_buffer_alloc_read_page() return error on offline CPU

to the 4.12-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ring-buffer-have-ring_buffer_alloc_read_page-return-error-on-offline-cpu.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.12 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From a7e52ad7ed82e21273eccff93d1477a7b313aabb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 14:20:54 -0400
Subject: ring-buffer: Have ring_buffer_alloc_read_page() return error on offline CPU

From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

commit a7e52ad7ed82e21273eccff93d1477a7b313aabb upstream.

Chunyu Hu reported:
  "per_cpu trace directories and files are created for all possible cpus,
   but only the cpus which have ever been on-lined have their own per cpu
   ring buffer (allocated by cpuhp threads). While trace_buffers_open, the
   open handler for trace file 'trace_pipe_raw' is always trying to access
   field of ring_buffer_per_cpu, and would panic with the NULL pointer.

   Align the behavior of trace_pipe_raw with trace_pipe, that returns -NODEV
   when openning it if that cpu does not have trace ring buffer.

   Reproduce:
   cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/per_cpu/cpu31/trace_pipe_raw
   (cpu31 is never on-lined, this is a 16 cores x86_64 box)

   Tested with:
   1) boot with maxcpus=14, read trace_pipe_raw of cpu15.
      Got -NODEV.
   2) oneline cpu15, read trace_pipe_raw of cpu15.
      Get the raw trace data.

   Call trace:
   [ 5760.950995] RIP: 0010:ring_buffer_alloc_read_page+0x32/0xe0
   [ 5760.961678]  tracing_buffers_read+0x1f6/0x230
   [ 5760.962695]  __vfs_read+0x37/0x160
   [ 5760.963498]  ? __vfs_read+0x5/0x160
   [ 5760.964339]  ? security_file_permission+0x9d/0xc0
   [ 5760.965451]  ? __vfs_read+0x5/0x160
   [ 5760.966280]  vfs_read+0x8c/0x130
   [ 5760.967070]  SyS_read+0x55/0xc0
   [ 5760.967779]  do_syscall_64+0x67/0x150
   [ 5760.968687]  entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25"

This was introduced by the addition of the feature to reuse reader pages
instead of re-allocating them. The problem is that the allocation of a
reader page (which is per cpu) does not check if the cpu is online and set
up for the ring buffer.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1500880866-1177-1-git-send-email-chuhu@redhat.com

Fixes: 73a757e63114 ("ring-buffer: Return reader page back into existing ring buffer")
Reported-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c           |   14 +++++++++-----
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c |    2 +-
 kernel/trace/trace.c                 |   16 +++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -4386,15 +4386,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_swap_cpu);
  * the page that was allocated, with the read page of the buffer.
  *
  * Returns:
- *  The page allocated, or NULL on error.
+ *  The page allocated, or ERR_PTR
  */
 void *ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
 {
-	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
+	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
 	struct buffer_data_page *bpage = NULL;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct page *page;
 
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+
+	cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	arch_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
 
@@ -4412,7 +4416,7 @@ void *ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(struct
 	page = alloc_pages_node(cpu_to_node(cpu),
 				GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY, 0);
 	if (!page)
-		return NULL;
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
 	bpage = page_address(page);
 
@@ -4467,8 +4471,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ring_buffer_free_read_
  *
  * for example:
  *	rpage = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(buffer, cpu);
- *	if (!rpage)
- *		return error;
+ *	if (IS_ERR(rpage))
+ *		return PTR_ERR(rpage);
  *	ret = ring_buffer_read_page(buffer, &rpage, len, cpu, 0);
  *	if (ret >= 0)
  *		process_page(rpage, ret);
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static enum event_status read_page(int c
 	int i;
 
 	bpage = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(buffer, cpu);
-	if (!bpage)
+	if (IS_ERR(bpage))
 		return EVENT_DROPPED;
 
 	ret = ring_buffer_read_page(buffer, &bpage, PAGE_SIZE, cpu, 1);
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -6403,7 +6403,7 @@ tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp,
 {
 	struct ftrace_buffer_info *info = filp->private_data;
 	struct trace_iterator *iter = &info->iter;
-	ssize_t ret;
+	ssize_t ret = 0;
 	ssize_t size;
 
 	if (!count)
@@ -6417,10 +6417,15 @@ tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp,
 	if (!info->spare) {
 		info->spare = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(iter->trace_buffer->buffer,
 							  iter->cpu_file);
-		info->spare_cpu = iter->cpu_file;
+		if (IS_ERR(info->spare)) {
+			ret = PTR_ERR(info->spare);
+			info->spare = NULL;
+		} else {
+			info->spare_cpu = iter->cpu_file;
+		}
 	}
 	if (!info->spare)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		return ret;
 
 	/* Do we have previous read data to read? */
 	if (info->read < PAGE_SIZE)
@@ -6595,8 +6600,9 @@ tracing_buffers_splice_read(struct file
 		ref->ref = 1;
 		ref->buffer = iter->trace_buffer->buffer;
 		ref->page = ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(ref->buffer, iter->cpu_file);
-		if (!ref->page) {
-			ret = -ENOMEM;
+		if (IS_ERR(ref->page)) {
+			ret = PTR_ERR(ref->page);
+			ref->page = NULL;
 			kfree(ref);
 			break;
 		}


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from rostedt@goodmis.org are

queue-4.12/tracing-missing-error-code-in-tracer_alloc_buffers.patch
queue-4.12/ring-buffer-have-ring_buffer_alloc_read_page-return-error-on-offline-cpu.patch
queue-4.12/ftrace-check-for-null-ret_stack-on-profile-function-graph-entry-function.patch
queue-4.12/tracing-fix-freeing-of-filter-in-create_filter-when-set_str-is-false.patch
queue-4.12/tracing-call-clear_boot_tracer-at-lateinit_sync.patch
queue-4.12/tracing-fix-kmemleak-in-tracing_map_array_free.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-08-27 12:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=150383849910889@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=chuhu@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.