diff for duplicates of <1504199166.666.11.camel@gmx.de> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 987ee06..8c4c328 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 15:42 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 08:46:28AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote: > > [SECOND TAKE, with just the name of one of the tester fixed] -> >=20 +> > > > Hi, > > while testing the read-write unfairness issues reported by Mel, I > > found BFQ failing to guarantee good responsiveness against heavy @@ -9,15 +9,14 @@ On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 15:42 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > random writes and systematic fdatasync [1]. The failure was caused by > > three related bugs, because of which BFQ failed to guarantee to > > high-weight processes the expected fraction of the throughput. -> >=20 ->=20 -> Queued on top of Ming's most recent series even though that's still a wor= -k +> > +> +> Queued on top of Ming's most recent series even though that's still a work > in progress. I should know in a few days how things stand. It seems to have cured an interactivity issue I regularly meet during kbuild final link/depmod phase of fat kernel kbuild, especially bad -with evolution mail usage during that on spinning rust. =C2=A0Can't really +with evolution mail usage during that on spinning rust. Can't really say for sure given this is not based on measurement. - -Mike=C2=A0 + -Mike diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index df35492..1a486b6 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ "On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 15:42 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:\n" "> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 08:46:28AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:\n" "> > [SECOND TAKE, with just the name of one of the tester fixed]\n" - "> >=20\n" + "> > \n" "> > Hi,\n" "> > while testing the read-write unfairness issues reported by Mel, I\n" "> > found BFQ failing to guarantee good responsiveness against heavy\n" @@ -25,17 +25,16 @@ "> > random writes and systematic fdatasync [1]. The failure was caused by\n" "> > three related bugs, because of which BFQ failed to guarantee to\n" "> > high-weight processes the expected fraction of the throughput.\n" - "> >=20\n" - ">=20\n" - "> Queued on top of Ming's most recent series even though that's still a wor=\n" - "k\n" + "> > \n" + "> \n" + "> Queued on top of Ming's most recent series even though that's still a work\n" "> in progress. I should know in a few days how things stand.\n" "\n" "It seems to have cured an interactivity issue I regularly meet during\n" "kbuild final link/depmod phase of fat kernel kbuild, especially bad\n" - "with evolution mail usage during that on spinning rust. =C2=A0Can't really\n" + "with evolution mail usage during that on spinning rust. \302\240Can't really\n" "say for sure given this is not based on measurement.\n" "\n" - "\t-Mike=C2=A0" + "\t-Mike" -20a4505a4dc543974a7d5be186c757509923148e04886c6596be2575f2907a6d +063d936278edaec183d2f80ffebdef41f5f1cb67388155cb3f4f285ac2454e49
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.