All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1504720637.30546.7.camel@synopsys.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 8eaac41..8132f8d 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,20 +1,20 @@
 Hi Petr,
 
-On Tue, 2017-09-05@16:54 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
+On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 16:54 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
 > On Mon 2017-08-28 19:58:07, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
 > > In the current implementation we take the first console that
 > > registers if we didn't select one.
-> >?
+> > 
 > > But if we specify console via "stdout-path" property in device tree
 > > we don't want first console that registers here to be selected.
 > > Otherwise we may choose wrong console - for example if some console
 > > is registered earlier than console is pointed in "stdout-path"
 > > property because console pointed in "stdout-path" property can be add as
 > > preferred quite late - when it's driver is probed.
->?
+> 
 > register_console() is really twisted function. I would like to better
 > understand your problems before we add yet another twist there.
->?
+> 
 > Could you please be more specific about your problems?
 > What was the output of "cat /proc/consoles" before and after the fix?
 > What exactly started and stopped working?
@@ -37,18 +37,18 @@ Example:
 Device tree:
 -------------->8--------
 chosen {
-????bootargs = ""
-????stdout-path = &serial_1;
+    bootargs = ""
+    stdout-path = &serial_1;
 };
 
-serial_0: uart-0 at ... {} /* FAIL: serial_0 is used as console (ttyS0) as it is
-?????????????????????????* probed earlier */
-serial_1: uart-1 at ... {}
+serial_0: uart-0@... {} /* FAIL: serial_0 is used as console (ttyS0) as it is
+                         * probed earlier */
+serial_1: uart-1@... {}
 -------------->8--------
 
 # cat /proc/consoles
-ttyS0????????????????-W- (EC???a)????4:64????/* FAIL: ttyS0 is used instead of?
-??????????????????????????????????????????????* ttyS1 */
+ttyS0                -W- (EC   a)    4:64    /* FAIL: ttyS0 is used instead of 
+                                              * ttyS1 */
 
 
 This FAIL happens because we take the first registered console if we didn't select
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ a console via "console=" option in bootargs.
 
 After my patch-v2:
 # cat /proc/consoles
-ttyS1????????????????-W- (EC p a)????4:67
+ttyS1                -W- (EC p a)    4:67
 
 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ Problem 2: printing early boot messages twice and pause in boot messages printin
 
 Context:
 We use early console. Serial console device (and early console device) specified
-via "stdout-path" property in device tree.?
+via "stdout-path" property in device tree. 
 Support for console on virtual terminal is enabled (CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE=y)
 
 In this case early boot messages will be printed twice - firstly by
@@ -75,17 +75,17 @@ mush earlier than 'real' serial console is enabled.
 Example:
 -------------->8--------
 chosen {
-????bootargs = "earlycon"
-????stdout-path = &serial_3;
+    bootargs = "earlycon"
+    stdout-path = &serial_3;
 };
 
-serial_3: uart-3 at ... {}?
+serial_3: uart-3@... {} 
 -------------->8--------
 
 So output of serial console will be be like that:
 -------------->8--------
 XXX - early boot messages, printed by bootconsole
-????- FAIL: pause in boot messages printing
+    - FAIL: pause in boot messages printing
 XXX - FAIL: again early boot messages, printed by serial console
 YYY - rest of boot messages, printed by serial console
 -------------->8--------
@@ -93,25 +93,25 @@ YYY - rest of boot messages, printed by serial console
 So the order of enabling/disabling consoles will be like that:
 -------------->8--------
 bootconsole [uart0] enabled
-console [tty0] enabled??????????????/* As no console is select 'tty0' was taken */
-bootconsole [uart0] disabled????????/* As we have real (tty0) console we disable
-?????????????????????????????????????* all bootconsoles */
-console [ttyS3] enabled?????????????/* We take ttyS3 but don't reset its?
-?????????????????????????????????????* CON_PRINTBUFFER flag (as there is NO enabled
-				?????* bootconsoles) */
+console [tty0] enabled              /* As no console is select 'tty0' was taken */
+bootconsole [uart0] disabled        /* As we have real (tty0) console we disable
+                                     * all bootconsoles */
+console [ttyS3] enabled             /* We take ttyS3 but don't reset its 
+                                     * CON_PRINTBUFFER flag (as there is NO enabled
+				     * bootconsoles) */
 -------------->8--------
 
 
 # cat /proc/consoles
-ttyS3????????????????-W- (EC p a)????4:67
-tty0?????????????????-WU (E?????)????4:1
+ttyS3                -W- (EC p a)    4:67
+tty0                 -WU (E     )    4:1
 
 As you can see CON_PRINTBUFFER flag (p) set for ttyS3 - that is wrong.
 
 After my patch-v2:
 # cat /proc/consoles
-ttyS3????????????????-W- (EC???a)????4:67
-tty0?????????????????-WU (E??p??)????4:1
+ttyS3                -W- (EC   a)    4:67
+tty0                 -WU (E  p  )    4:1
 
 
 These are the problems I have faced but these are NOT THE ONLY POSSIBLE problems
@@ -122,28 +122,28 @@ but in this case we will face with someone complaining about "tty0".
 
 So all comments and suggestions are more than welcome.
 
-?
 > > We retain previous behavior for tty0 console (if "stdout-path" used)
 > > as a special case:
 > > tty0 will be registered even if it was specified neither
 > > in "bootargs" nor in "stdout-path".
 > > We had to retain this behavior because a lot of ARM boards (and some
 > > powerpc) rely on it.
->?
+> 
 > My main concern is the exception for "tty". Yes, it was regiression
 > reported in the commit c6c7d83b9c9e6a8b3e ("Revert "console: don't
 > prefer first registered if DT specifies stdout-path""). But is this
 > the only possible regression?
->?
->?
+> 
+> 
 > All this is about the fallback code that tries to enable all
 > consoles until a real one with tty binding (newcon->device)
 > is enabled.
->?
+> 
 > v1 version of you patch disabled this fallback code when a console
 > was defined by stdout-path in the device tree. This emulates
 > defining the console by console= parameter on the command line.
->?
+> 
 > It might make sense until some complains that a console is not
 > longer automatically enabled while it was before. But wait.
 > Someone already complained about "tty0". We can solve this
@@ -153,13 +153,13 @@ So all comments and suggestions are more than welcome.
 > We might endup with so many exceptions that the fallback code
 > will be always used. But then we are back in the square
 > and have the original behavior before your patch.
->?
+> 
 
 Yes, I understand your concerns.
 
 But I also have another concern: If we decide to left current behavior untouched
 (like after reverting patch 05fd007e4629)
-more and more boards and devices will use current broken stdout-path behavior in?
+more and more boards and devices will use current broken stdout-path behavior in 
 any form and in the results we will get the situation when we can't fix
 stdout-path behavior at all - because every change will break something somewhere.
 
@@ -168,8 +168,8 @@ stdout-path behavior at all - because every change will break something somewher
 > This is why I would like to know more info about your problem.
 > We need to decide if it is more important than a regression.
 > Or if it can be fixed another way.
->?
+> 
 > Best Regards,
 > Petr
---?
-?Eugeniy Paltsev
+-- 
+ Eugeniy Paltsev
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 3bed1d5..5c0b24a 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,29 +1,35 @@
  "ref\020170828165807.8408-1-Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com\0"
  "ref\020170828165807.8408-3-Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com\0"
  "ref\020170905145405.GH8741@pathway.suse.cz\0"
- "From\0Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com (Eugeniy Paltsev)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH v2 2/2] console: don't select first registered console if stdout-path used\0"
+ "From\0Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] console: don't select first registered console if stdout-path used\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 6 Sep 2017 17:57:18 +0000\0"
- "To\0linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0pmladek@suse.com <pmladek@suse.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0hdegoede@redhat.com <hdegoede@redhat.com>"
+  paul.burton@imgtec.com <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
+  sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
+  rostedt@goodmis.org <rostedt@goodmis.org>
+ " linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Hi Petr,\n"
  "\n"
- "On Tue, 2017-09-05@16:54 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:\n"
+ "On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 16:54 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:\n"
  "> On Mon 2017-08-28 19:58:07, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:\n"
  "> > In the current implementation we take the first console that\n"
  "> > registers if we didn't select one.\n"
- "> >?\n"
+ "> >\302\240\n"
  "> > But if we specify console via \"stdout-path\" property in device tree\n"
  "> > we don't want first console that registers here to be selected.\n"
  "> > Otherwise we may choose wrong console - for example if some console\n"
  "> > is registered earlier than console is pointed in \"stdout-path\"\n"
  "> > property because console pointed in \"stdout-path\" property can be add as\n"
  "> > preferred quite late - when it's driver is probed.\n"
- ">?\n"
+ ">\302\240\n"
  "> register_console() is really twisted function. I would like to better\n"
  "> understand your problems before we add yet another twist there.\n"
- ">?\n"
+ ">\302\240\n"
  "> Could you please be more specific about your problems?\n"
  "> What was the output of \"cat /proc/consoles\" before and after the fix?\n"
  "> What exactly started and stopped working?\n"
@@ -46,18 +52,18 @@
  "Device tree:\n"
  "-------------->8--------\n"
  "chosen {\n"
- "????bootargs = \"\"\n"
- "????stdout-path = &serial_1;\n"
+ "\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240bootargs = \"\"\n"
+ "\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240stdout-path = &serial_1;\n"
  "};\n"
  "\n"
- "serial_0: uart-0 at ... {} /* FAIL: serial_0 is used as console (ttyS0) as it is\n"
- "?????????????????????????* probed earlier */\n"
- "serial_1: uart-1 at ... {}\n"
+ "serial_0: uart-0@... {} /* FAIL: serial_0 is used as console (ttyS0) as it is\n"
+ "\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240* probed earlier */\n"
+ "serial_1: uart-1@... {}\n"
  "-------------->8--------\n"
  "\n"
  "# cat /proc/consoles\n"
- "ttyS0????????????????-W- (EC???a)????4:64????/* FAIL: ttyS0 is used instead of?\n"
- "??????????????????????????????????????????????* ttyS1 */\n"
+ "ttyS0\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240-W- (EC\302\240\302\240\302\240a)\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\2404:64\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240/* FAIL: ttyS0 is used instead of\302\240\n"
+ "\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240* ttyS1 */\n"
  "\n"
  "\n"
  "This FAIL happens because we take the first registered console if we didn't select\n"
@@ -65,7 +71,7 @@
  "\n"
  "After my patch-v2:\n"
  "# cat /proc/consoles\n"
- "ttyS1????????????????-W- (EC p a)????4:67\n"
+ "ttyS1\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240-W- (EC p a)\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\2404:67\n"
  "\n"
  "\n"
  "-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n"
@@ -73,7 +79,7 @@
  "\n"
  "Context:\n"
  "We use early console. Serial console device (and early console device) specified\n"
- "via \"stdout-path\" property in device tree.?\n"
+ "via \"stdout-path\" property in device tree.\302\240\n"
  "Support for console on virtual terminal is enabled (CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE=y)\n"
  "\n"
  "In this case early boot messages will be printed twice - firstly by\n"
@@ -84,17 +90,17 @@
  "Example:\n"
  "-------------->8--------\n"
  "chosen {\n"
- "????bootargs = \"earlycon\"\n"
- "????stdout-path = &serial_3;\n"
+ "\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240bootargs = \"earlycon\"\n"
+ "\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240stdout-path = &serial_3;\n"
  "};\n"
  "\n"
- "serial_3: uart-3 at ... {}?\n"
+ "serial_3: uart-3@... {}\302\240\n"
  "-------------->8--------\n"
  "\n"
  "So output of serial console will be be like that:\n"
  "-------------->8--------\n"
  "XXX - early boot messages, printed by bootconsole\n"
- "????- FAIL: pause in boot messages printing\n"
+ "\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240- FAIL: pause in boot messages printing\n"
  "XXX - FAIL: again early boot messages, printed by serial console\n"
  "YYY - rest of boot messages, printed by serial console\n"
  "-------------->8--------\n"
@@ -102,25 +108,25 @@
  "So the order of enabling/disabling consoles will be like that:\n"
  "-------------->8--------\n"
  "bootconsole [uart0] enabled\n"
- "console [tty0] enabled??????????????/* As no console is select 'tty0' was taken */\n"
- "bootconsole [uart0] disabled????????/* As we have real (tty0) console we disable\n"
- "?????????????????????????????????????* all bootconsoles */\n"
- "console [ttyS3] enabled?????????????/* We take ttyS3 but don't reset its?\n"
- "?????????????????????????????????????* CON_PRINTBUFFER flag (as there is NO enabled\n"
- "\t\t\t\t?????* bootconsoles) */\n"
+ "console [tty0] enabled\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240/* As no console is select 'tty0' was taken */\n"
+ "bootconsole [uart0] disabled\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240/* As we have real (tty0) console we disable\n"
+ "\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240* all bootconsoles */\n"
+ "console [ttyS3] enabled\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240/* We take ttyS3 but don't reset its\302\240\n"
+ "\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240* CON_PRINTBUFFER flag (as there is NO enabled\n"
+ "\t\t\t\t\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240* bootconsoles) */\n"
  "-------------->8--------\n"
  "\n"
  "\n"
  "# cat /proc/consoles\n"
- "ttyS3????????????????-W- (EC p a)????4:67\n"
- "tty0?????????????????-WU (E?????)????4:1\n"
+ "ttyS3\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240-W- (EC p a)\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\2404:67\n"
+ "tty0\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240-WU (E\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240)\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\2404:1\n"
  "\n"
  "As you can see CON_PRINTBUFFER flag (p) set for ttyS3 - that is wrong.\n"
  "\n"
  "After my patch-v2:\n"
  "# cat /proc/consoles\n"
- "ttyS3????????????????-W- (EC???a)????4:67\n"
- "tty0?????????????????-WU (E??p??)????4:1\n"
+ "ttyS3\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240-W- (EC\302\240\302\240\302\240a)\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\2404:67\n"
+ "tty0\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240-WU (E\302\240\302\240p\302\240\302\240)\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\2404:1\n"
  "\n"
  "\n"
  "These are the problems I have faced but these are NOT THE ONLY POSSIBLE problems\n"
@@ -131,28 +137,28 @@
  "\n"
  "So all comments and suggestions are more than welcome.\n"
  "\n"
- "?\n"
+ "\302\240\n"
  "> > We retain previous behavior for tty0 console (if \"stdout-path\" used)\n"
  "> > as a special case:\n"
  "> > tty0 will be registered even if it was specified neither\n"
  "> > in \"bootargs\" nor in \"stdout-path\".\n"
  "> > We had to retain this behavior because a lot of ARM boards (and some\n"
  "> > powerpc) rely on it.\n"
- ">?\n"
+ ">\302\240\n"
  "> My main concern is the exception for \"tty\". Yes, it was regiression\n"
  "> reported in the commit c6c7d83b9c9e6a8b3e (\"Revert \"console: don't\n"
  "> prefer first registered if DT specifies stdout-path\"\"). But is this\n"
  "> the only possible regression?\n"
- ">?\n"
- ">?\n"
+ ">\302\240\n"
+ ">\302\240\n"
  "> All this is about the fallback code that tries to enable all\n"
  "> consoles until a real one with tty binding (newcon->device)\n"
  "> is enabled.\n"
- ">?\n"
+ ">\302\240\n"
  "> v1 version of you patch disabled this fallback code when a console\n"
  "> was defined by stdout-path in the device tree. This emulates\n"
  "> defining the console by console= parameter on the command line.\n"
- ">?\n"
+ ">\302\240\n"
  "> It might make sense until some complains that a console is not\n"
  "> longer automatically enabled while it was before. But wait.\n"
  "> Someone already complained about \"tty0\". We can solve this\n"
@@ -162,13 +168,13 @@
  "> We might endup with so many exceptions that the fallback code\n"
  "> will be always used. But then we are back in the square\n"
  "> and have the original behavior before your patch.\n"
- ">?\n"
+ ">\302\240\n"
  "\n"
  "Yes, I understand your concerns.\n"
  "\n"
  "But I also have another concern: If we decide to left current behavior untouched\n"
  "(like after reverting patch 05fd007e4629)\n"
- "more and more boards and devices will use current broken stdout-path behavior in?\n"
+ "more and more boards and devices will use current broken stdout-path behavior in\302\240\n"
  "any form and in the results we will get the situation when we can't fix\n"
  "stdout-path behavior at all - because every change will break something somewhere.\n"
  "\n"
@@ -177,10 +183,10 @@
  "> This is why I would like to know more info about your problem.\n"
  "> We need to decide if it is more important than a regression.\n"
  "> Or if it can be fixed another way.\n"
- ">?\n"
+ ">\302\240\n"
  "> Best Regards,\n"
  "> Petr\n"
- "--?\n"
- ?Eugeniy Paltsev
+ "--\302\240\n"
+ "\302\240Eugeniy Paltsev"
 
-c7ef2c3322f8df6c53a93abd105fd4eee6e69be79c430317b0c46d5eba177c4f
+c2dde89ec93b17a2dae4a0e9fa68d68ec2a3cb712e80c46107154e7e83bae160

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.