From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 11:04:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/29] pinctrl: Declare operation structures as const Message-Id: <1504898.E67gazT2t2@avalon> List-Id: References: <1362574370-17889-2-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> In-Reply-To: <1362574370-17889-2-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org Hi Simon, On Friday 08 March 2013 09:23:27 Simon Horman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 12:25:53AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thursday 07 March 2013 09:17:38 Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > The pinconf, pinctrl and pinmux operation structures hold function > > > > pointers that are never modified. Declare them as const. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart > > > > > > > > > > I have this patch in the pinctrl tree nowadays... > > > > OK, I'll drop it from this set. > > Hi Laurent, > > when you repost could you please let me know > > a) the base/dependencies - though I assume this will be obvious > from the structure of your git tree and; > b) weather or not the patches are ready to be queued up for v3.10. > > Likewise for " PFC pinctrl functions for sh7372, sh73a0, r8a7740 and > r8a7779" which I assume you will repost after rebasing on a fresh version > of this series. If not, please let me know. I've reposted both series. As stated in the cover letters I consider them both ready to be queued up for v3.10. They depend on two commits from the pinctrl tree (that are fortunately based right on top of v3.9-rc1, so you can easily merge them into your tree) and one board patch I've picked from the linux-sh mailing list (this is explained in the cover letter of the first patch series as well). -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart