From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: rwareing@fb.com, david@fromorbit.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] xfs: XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE() should be false if no rt device" failed to apply to 3.18-stable tree
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 20:41:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <150527408232250@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 3.18-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From b31ff3cdf540110da4572e3e29bd172087af65cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Wareing <rwareing@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:09:35 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE() should be false if no rt device
present
If using a kernel with CONFIG_XFS_RT=y and we set the RHINHERIT flag on
a directory in a filesystem that does not have a realtime device and
create a new file in that directory, it gets marked as a real time file.
When data is written and a fsync is issued, the filesystem attempts to
flush a non-existent rt device during the fsync process.
This results in a crash dereferencing a null buftarg pointer in
xfs_blkdev_issue_flush():
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
IP: xfs_blkdev_issue_flush+0xd/0x20
.....
Call Trace:
xfs_file_fsync+0x188/0x1c0
vfs_fsync_range+0x3b/0xa0
do_fsync+0x3d/0x70
SyS_fsync+0x10/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x4d/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
Setting RT inode flags does not require special privileges so any
unprivileged user can cause this oops to occur. To reproduce, confirm
kernel is compiled with CONFIG_XFS_RT=y and run:
# mkfs.xfs -f /dev/pmem0
# mount /dev/pmem0 /mnt/test
# mkdir /mnt/test/foo
# xfs_io -c 'chattr +t' /mnt/test/foo
# xfs_io -f -c 'pwrite 0 5m' -c fsync /mnt/test/foo/bar
Or just run xfstests with MKFS_OPTIONS="-d rtinherit=1" and wait.
Kernels built with CONFIG_XFS_RT=n are not exposed to this bug.
Fixes: f538d4da8d52 ("[XFS] write barrier support")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Wareing <rwareing@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h
index 9301c5a6060b..dcd1292664b3 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h
@@ -270,7 +270,14 @@ static inline uint64_t howmany_64(uint64_t x, uint32_t y)
#endif /* DEBUG */
#ifdef CONFIG_XFS_RT
-#define XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip) ((ip)->i_d.di_flags & XFS_DIFLAG_REALTIME)
+
+/*
+ * make sure we ignore the inode flag if the filesystem doesn't have a
+ * configured realtime device.
+ */
+#define XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip) \
+ (((ip)->i_d.di_flags & XFS_DIFLAG_REALTIME) && \
+ (ip)->i_mount->m_rtdev_targp)
#else
#define XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip) (0)
#endif
next reply other threads:[~2017-09-13 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-13 3:41 gregkh [this message]
2017-09-13 3:45 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] xfs: XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE() should be false if no rt device" failed to apply to 3.18-stable tree Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=150527408232250@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=rwareing@fb.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.