All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	marinoj@nso.edu, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: patch "xhci: Fix sleeping with spin_lock_irq() held in ASmedia 1042A" added to usb-linus
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:11:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <150574746675191@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    xhci: Fix sleeping with spin_lock_irq() held in ASmedia 1042A

to my usb git tree which can be found at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git
in the usb-linus branch.

The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)

The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.

If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.


>From 4ec1cd3eeeee7ccc35681270da028dbc29ca7bbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:39:17 +0300
Subject: xhci: Fix sleeping with spin_lock_irq() held in ASmedia 1042A
 workaround

The flow control workaround for ASM1042A xHC hosts sleeps between
register polling. The workaround gets called in several places, among
them with spin_lock_irq() held when xHC host is resumed or hoplug removed.

This was noticed as kernel panics at resume on a Dell XPS15 9550 with
TB16 thunderbolt dock.

Avoid sleeping with spin_lock_irq() held, use udelay() instead

The original workaround was added to 4.9 and 4.12 stable releases,
this patch needs to be applied to those as well.

Fixes: 9da5a1092b13 ("xhci: Bad Ethernet performance plugged in ASM1042A host")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #4.9+
Reported-by: Jose Marino <marinoj@nso.edu>
Tested-by: Jose Marino <marinoj@nso.edu>
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c b/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c
index e02dbb1e1cdd..6dda3623a276 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static int usb_asmedia_wait_write(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 		if ((value & ASMT_CONTROL_WRITE_BIT) == 0)
 			return 0;
 
-		usleep_range(40, 60);
+		udelay(50);
 	}
 
 	dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "%s: check_write_ready timeout", __func__);
-- 
2.14.1

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-09-18 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=150574746675191@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=marinoj@nso.edu \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.