From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
James Bottomley <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:38:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1505929138.12311.5.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170920162910.32053-8-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 01:29 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
> enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such
> dereference is required.
>
> checkpatch warning example:
>
> WARNING: Use '%pS/%ps' instead. This pointer extension was deprecated: '%pF'
If this series is accepted, I think this message
is unclear and would prefer something like:
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index dd2c262aebbf..71f3273d5913 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -5762,18 +5762,25 @@ sub process {
for (my $count = $linenr; $count <= $lc; $count++) {
my $fmt = get_quoted_string($lines[$count - 1], raw_line($count, 0));
$fmt =~ s/%%//g;
- if ($fmt =~ /(\%[\*\d\.]*p(?![\WFfSsBKRraEhMmIiUDdgVCbGNO]).)/) {
+ if ($fmt =~ /(\%[\*\d\.]*p(?![\WSsBKRraEhMmIiUDdgVCbGNO]).)/) {
$bad_extension = $1;
last;
}
}
if ($bad_extension ne "") {
my $stat_real = raw_line($linenr, 0);
+ my $ext_type = "Invalid";
+ my $use = "";
for (my $count = $linenr + 1; $count <= $lc; $count++) {
$stat_real = $stat_real . "\n" . raw_line($count, 0);
}
+ if ($bad_extension =~ /p[Ff]/i) {
+ $ext_type = "Deprecated";
+ $use = " - use %pS instead";
+ $use =~ s/pS/ps/ if ($bad_extension =~ /pf/);
+ }
WARN("VSPRINTF_POINTER_EXTENSION",
- "Invalid vsprintf pointer extension '$bad_extension'\n" . "$here\n$stat_real\n");
+ "$ext_type vsprintf pointer extension '$bad_extension'$use\n" . "$here\n$stat_real\n");
}
}
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
James Bottomley <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:38:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1505929138.12311.5.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170920162910.32053-8-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 01:29 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart
> enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such
> dereference is required.
>
> checkpatch warning example:
>
> WARNING: Use '%pS/%ps' instead. This pointer extension was deprecated: '%pF'
If this series is accepted, I think this message
is unclear and would prefer something like:
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index dd2c262aebbf..71f3273d5913 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -5762,18 +5762,25 @@ sub process {
for (my $count = $linenr; $count <= $lc; $count++) {
my $fmt = get_quoted_string($lines[$count - 1], raw_line($count, 0));
$fmt =~ s/%%//g;
- if ($fmt =~ /(\%[\*\d\.]*p(?![\WFfSsBKRraEhMmIiUDdgVCbGNO]).)/) {
+ if ($fmt =~ /(\%[\*\d\.]*p(?![\WSsBKRraEhMmIiUDdgVCbGNO]).)/) {
$bad_extension = $1;
last;
}
}
if ($bad_extension ne "") {
my $stat_real = raw_line($linenr, 0);
+ my $ext_type = "Invalid";
+ my $use = "";
for (my $count = $linenr + 1; $count <= $lc; $count++) {
$stat_real = $stat_real . "\n" . raw_line($count, 0);
}
+ if ($bad_extension =~ /p[Ff]/i) {
+ $ext_type = "Deprecated";
+ $use = " - use %pS instead";
+ $use =~ s/pS/ps/ if ($bad_extension =~ /pf/);
+ }
WARN("VSPRINTF_POINTER_EXTENSION",
- "Invalid vsprintf pointer extension '$bad_extension'\n" . "$here\n$stat_real\n");
+ "$ext_type vsprintf pointer extension '$bad_extension'$use\n" . "$here\n$stat_real\n");
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-20 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-20 16:29 [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:29 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 1/7] switch dereference_function_descriptor() to `unsigned long' Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:29 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 2/7] sections: split dereference_function_descriptor() Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:29 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 3/7] ia64: Add .opd based function descriptor dereference Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:29 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 4/7] powerpc64: " Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:29 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 5/7] parisc64: " Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:29 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 6/7] symbol lookup: use new kernel and module dereference functions Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-21 9:38 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-21 9:38 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:29 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 17:38 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2017-09-20 17:38 ` Joe Perches
2017-09-20 17:53 ` Helge Deller
2017-09-20 17:53 ` Helge Deller
2017-09-20 18:24 ` Joe Perches
2017-09-20 18:24 ` Joe Perches
2017-09-21 7:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-21 7:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-21 0:27 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-21 0:27 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-21 2:28 ` Joe Perches
2017-09-21 2:28 ` Joe Perches
2017-09-20 16:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:33 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 16:33 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-20 20:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Helge Deller
2017-09-20 20:14 ` Helge Deller
2017-09-21 0:30 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-21 0:30 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-22 5:34 ` Santosh Sivaraj
2017-09-22 5:46 ` Santosh Sivaraj
2017-09-22 8:00 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-22 8:00 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-22 16:48 ` Luck, Tony
2017-09-25 7:05 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-25 7:05 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-25 7:05 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-25 16:29 ` Luck, Tony
2017-09-25 17:05 ` Helge Deller
2017-09-25 17:05 ` Helge Deller
2017-09-27 5:01 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-09-27 5:01 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-10-19 14:11 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-10-19 14:11 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-10-19 14:11 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-27 6:26 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-09-27 6:26 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-09-28 1:11 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-09-28 1:11 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1505929138.12311.5.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.