From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id E03BEE00D0F; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 05:45:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F22E00D0D for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 05:45:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id v8PCjBSI022651 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 25 Sep 2017 13:45:12 +0100 Message-ID: <1506343511.31732.22.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Rich Persaud Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 13:45:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8C5544EC-5FF6-434A-8589-62C3DF47867F@gmail.com> References: <20170925084113.30094-1-Qi.Chen@windriver.com> <1506336011.31732.13.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <8C5544EC-5FF6-434A-8589-62C3DF47867F@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at dan X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: meta-virtualization@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] sanity-bbappend.bbclass: add class for bbappend files checking X-BeenThere: meta-virtualization@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of layer enabling hypervisor, virtualization tool stack, and cloud support" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:45:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 08:00 -0400, Rich Persaud wrote: > On Sep 25, 2017, at 06:40, Richard Purdie tion.org> wrote: > ... > > > > So yes, I think there is a valid issue here and in many senses, YP > > Compat v2 is probably highlighting a real problem but I suspect > > this > > patch series is not the way to fix it... > Are there docs on YP Compat v2?  A web search turned up this RFC: > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2017-February/034489.h > tml There is the yocto-layer-check script which basically embodies the planned changes. I do need to write up a lot of the information but am struggling to find the time to do that the justice it needs... Cheers, Richard