[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/19] arm: socfpga: Add drivers for programing FPGA from flash

[Chee, Tien Fong <tien.fong.chee@intel.com>]

On Sel, 2017-09-26 at 12:32 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 09/26/2017 10:30 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
> > 
> > On Isn, 2017-09-25 at 11:14 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 09/25/2017 10:40 AM, tien.fong.chee at intel.com wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > From: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee@intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > These drivers handle FPGA program operation from flash loading
> > > > RBF to memory and then to program FPGA.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee@intel.com>
> > > Did you run checkpatch on this before submitting ? I presume no
> > > ...
> > > 
> > Yeah, i run checkpatch for all patches. What's the issue here?
> It should definitely indicate problem with ie. yoda-notation
> +if (0 == flashinfo->remaining) {
> and indent ...
> 
No complaint from checkpath. I know someone saying bad for readbility,
but yoda-notation at this simple implementation doesn't impact the
readbility, and having benefit to leverage detection of compiler on
missing "=". Overall, this can help to improve coding quality. I can
remove it if this doesn't favored in U-boot.
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ---
> > > >  .../include/mach/fpga_manager_arria10.h            |  27 ++
> > > >  drivers/fpga/socfpga_arria10.c                     | 391
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > >  include/altera.h                                   |   6 +
> > > >  include/configs/socfpga_common.h                   |   4 +
> > > >  4 files changed, 425 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > @@ -112,13 +122,14 @@ static int
> > > > wait_for_nconfig_pin_and_nstatus_pin(void)
> > > >  	unsigned long mask =
> > > > ALT_FPGAMGR_IMGCFG_STAT_F2S_NCONFIG_PIN_SET_MSK |
> > > >  				ALT_FPGAMGR_IMGCFG_STAT_F2S_NS
> > > > TATU
> > > > S_PIN_SET_MSK;
> > > >  
> > > > -	/* Poll until f2s_nconfig_pin and f2s_nstatus_pin;
> > > > loop
> > > > until de-asserted,
> > > > -	 * timeout at 1000ms
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * Poll until f2s_nconfig_pin and f2s_nstatus_pin;
> > > > loop
> > > > until
> > > > +	 * de-asserted, timeout at 1000ms
> > > >  	 */
> > > >  	return wait_for_bit(__func__,
> > > >  			    &fpga_manager_base->imgcfg_stat,
> > > >  			    mask,
> > > > -			    false, FPGA_TIMEOUT_MSEC, false);
> > > > +			    true, FPGA_TIMEOUT_MSEC, false);
> > > >  }
> > > Seems more like a fix, split this out.
> > > 
> > Okay.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  static int wait_for_f2s_nstatus_pin(unsigned long value)
> > > > @@ -469,6 +480,7 @@ int socfpga_load(Altera_desc *desc, const
> > > > void
> > > > *rbf_data, size_t rbf_size)
> > > >  
> > > >  	/* Initialize the FPGA Manager */
> > > >  	status = fpgamgr_program_init((u32 *)rbf_data,
> > > > rbf_size);
> > > > +
> > > >  	if (status)
> > > >  		return status;
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -477,3 +489,376 @@ int socfpga_load(Altera_desc *desc, const
> > > > void *rbf_data, size_t rbf_size)
> > > >  
> > > >  	return fpgamgr_program_finish();
> > > >  }
> > > > +
> > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_FPGA_LOADFS)
> > > > +const char *get_cff_filename(const void *fdt, int *len, u32
> > > > core)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	const char *cff_filename = NULL;
> > > > +	const char *cell;
> > > > +	int nodeoffset;
> > > > +	nodeoffset = fdtdec_next_compatible(fdt, 0,
> > > > +			 COMPAT_ALTERA_SOCFPGA_FPGA0);
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (nodeoffset >= 0) {
> > > > +		if (core)
> > > > +			cell = fdt_getprop(fdt,
> > > > +					nodeoffset,
> > > > +					"bitstream_core",
> > > > +					len);
> > > > +		else
> > > > +			cell = fdt_getprop(fdt, nodeoffset,
> > > > "bitstream_periph",
> > > > +					 len);
> > > > +
> > > > +		if (cell)
> > > > +			cff_filename = cell;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	return cff_filename;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +const char *get_cff_devpart(const void *fdt, int *len)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	const char *cff_devpart = NULL;
> > > > +	const char *cell;
> > > > +	int nodeoffset;
> > > > +	nodeoffset = fdtdec_next_compatible(fdt, 0,
> > > > +			 COMPAT_ALTERA_SOCFPGA_FPGA0);
> > > > +
> > > > +	cell = fdt_getprop(fdt, nodeoffset,
> > > > "bitstream_devpart",
> > > > len);
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (cell)
> > > > +		cff_devpart = cell;
> > > > +
> > > > +	return cff_devpart;
> > > > +}
> > > Take a look at splash*.c , I believe that can be reworked into
> > > generic
> > > firmware loader , which you could then use here.
> This is important here, I don't want yet another ad-hoc loader ...
> 
Disucss in another email reply separately. I need time to think.
> > 
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/include/configs/socfpga_common.h
> > > > b/include/configs/socfpga_common.h
> > > > index 9897e11..eadce2d 100644
> > > > --- a/include/configs/socfpga_common.h
> > > > +++ b/include/configs/socfpga_common.h
> > > > @@ -27,7 +27,11 @@
> > > >   */
> > > >  #define CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS		1
> > > >  #define PHYS_SDRAM_1			0x0
> > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
> > > >  #define CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN		(64 * 1024 *
> > > > 1024)
> > > > +#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10)
> > > > +#define CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN		(128 * 1024 *
> > > > 1024)
> > > > +#endif
> > > You definitely don't need 128 MiB of malloc area.
> > > 
> > Okay, i will try out with smaller size.
> Why do you need such massive area ? It's not a matter of "try out",
> you
> should know why this change was needed for your use-case.
> 
I forgot what reason i put this value. I need to find out.
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  #define CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_START	PHYS_SDRAM_1
> > > >  #define CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END		PHYS_SDRAM_1_SIZ
> > > > E
> > > >  #if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5)
> > > > 
>