All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: changbin.du@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, zhenyuw@linux.intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "drm/i915/gvt: Fix incorrect PCI BARs reporting" has been added to the 4.13-stable tree
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 11:41:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1506937305207147@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    drm/i915/gvt: Fix incorrect PCI BARs reporting

to the 4.13-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     drm-i915-gvt-fix-incorrect-pci-bars-reporting.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.13 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 7b4dc3c0da0d66e7b20a826c537d41bb73e4df54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 17:49:58 +0800
Subject: drm/i915/gvt: Fix incorrect PCI BARs reporting

From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>

commit 7b4dc3c0da0d66e7b20a826c537d41bb73e4df54 upstream.

Looking at our virtual PCI device, we can see surprising Region 4 and Region 5.
00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Sky Lake Integrated Graphics (rev 06) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
        ....
        Region 0: Memory at 140000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
        Region 2: Memory at 180000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=1G]
        Region 4: Memory at <ignored> (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
        Region 5: Memory at <ignored> (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
        Expansion ROM at febd6000 [disabled] [size=2K]

The fact is that we only implemented BAR0 and BAR2. Surprising Region 4 and
Region 5 are shown because we report their size as 0xffffffff. They should
report size 0 instead.

BTW, the physical GPU has a PIO BAR. GVTg hasn't implemented PIO access, so
we ignored this BAR for vGPU device.

v2: fix BAR size value calculation.

Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458032
Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit f1751362d6357a90bc6e53176cec715ff2dbed74)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cfg_space.c |  113 ++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cfg_space.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cfg_space.c
@@ -197,78 +197,65 @@ static int emulate_pci_command_write(str
 static int emulate_pci_bar_write(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, unsigned int offset,
 	void *p_data, unsigned int bytes)
 {
-	unsigned int bar_index =
-		(rounddown(offset, 8) % PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0) / 8;
 	u32 new = *(u32 *)(p_data);
 	bool lo = IS_ALIGNED(offset, 8);
 	u64 size;
 	int ret = 0;
 	bool mmio_enabled =
 		vgpu_cfg_space(vgpu)[PCI_COMMAND] & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY;
+	struct intel_vgpu_pci_bar *bars = vgpu->cfg_space.bar;
 
-	if (WARN_ON(bar_index >= INTEL_GVT_PCI_BAR_MAX))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
+	/*
+	 * Power-up software can determine how much address
+	 * space the device requires by writing a value of
+	 * all 1's to the register and then reading the value
+	 * back. The device will return 0's in all don't-care
+	 * address bits.
+	 */
 	if (new == 0xffffffff) {
-		/*
-		 * Power-up software can determine how much address
-		 * space the device requires by writing a value of
-		 * all 1's to the register and then reading the value
-		 * back. The device will return 0's in all don't-care
-		 * address bits.
-		 */
-		size = vgpu->cfg_space.bar[bar_index].size;
-		if (lo) {
-			new = rounddown(new, size);
-		} else {
-			u32 val = vgpu_cfg_space(vgpu)[rounddown(offset, 8)];
-			/* for 32bit mode bar it returns all-0 in upper 32
-			 * bit, for 64bit mode bar it will calculate the
-			 * size with lower 32bit and return the corresponding
-			 * value
+		switch (offset) {
+		case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0:
+		case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1:
+			size = ~(bars[INTEL_GVT_PCI_BAR_GTTMMIO].size -1);
+			intel_vgpu_write_pci_bar(vgpu, offset,
+						size >> (lo ? 0 : 32), lo);
+			/*
+			 * Untrap the BAR, since guest hasn't configured a
+			 * valid GPA
 			 */
-			if (val & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)
-				new &= (~(size-1)) >> 32;
-			else
-				new = 0;
-		}
-		/*
-		 * Unmapp & untrap the BAR, since guest hasn't configured a
-		 * valid GPA
-		 */
-		switch (bar_index) {
-		case INTEL_GVT_PCI_BAR_GTTMMIO:
 			ret = trap_gttmmio(vgpu, false);
 			break;
-		case INTEL_GVT_PCI_BAR_APERTURE:
+		case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_2:
+		case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_3:
+			size = ~(bars[INTEL_GVT_PCI_BAR_APERTURE].size -1);
+			intel_vgpu_write_pci_bar(vgpu, offset,
+						size >> (lo ? 0 : 32), lo);
 			ret = map_aperture(vgpu, false);
 			break;
+		default:
+			/* Unimplemented BARs */
+			intel_vgpu_write_pci_bar(vgpu, offset, 0x0, false);
 		}
-		intel_vgpu_write_pci_bar(vgpu, offset, new, lo);
 	} else {
-		/*
-		 * Unmapp & untrap the old BAR first, since guest has
-		 * re-configured the BAR
-		 */
-		switch (bar_index) {
-		case INTEL_GVT_PCI_BAR_GTTMMIO:
-			ret = trap_gttmmio(vgpu, false);
+		switch (offset) {
+		case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0:
+		case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1:
+			/*
+			 * Untrap the old BAR first, since guest has
+			 * re-configured the BAR
+			 */
+			trap_gttmmio(vgpu, false);
+			intel_vgpu_write_pci_bar(vgpu, offset, new, lo);
+			ret = trap_gttmmio(vgpu, mmio_enabled);
 			break;
-		case INTEL_GVT_PCI_BAR_APERTURE:
-			ret = map_aperture(vgpu, false);
+		case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_2:
+		case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_3:
+			map_aperture(vgpu, false);
+			intel_vgpu_write_pci_bar(vgpu, offset, new, lo);
+			ret = map_aperture(vgpu, mmio_enabled);
 			break;
-		}
-		intel_vgpu_write_pci_bar(vgpu, offset, new, lo);
-		/* Track the new BAR */
-		if (mmio_enabled) {
-			switch (bar_index) {
-			case INTEL_GVT_PCI_BAR_GTTMMIO:
-				ret = trap_gttmmio(vgpu, true);
-				break;
-			case INTEL_GVT_PCI_BAR_APERTURE:
-				ret = map_aperture(vgpu, true);
-				break;
-			}
+		default:
+			intel_vgpu_write_pci_bar(vgpu, offset, new, lo);
 		}
 	}
 	return ret;
@@ -299,10 +286,7 @@ int intel_vgpu_emulate_cfg_write(struct
 	}
 
 	switch (rounddown(offset, 4)) {
-	case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0:
-	case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1:
-	case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_2:
-	case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_3:
+	case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0 ... PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_5:
 		if (WARN_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(offset, 4)))
 			return -EINVAL;
 		return emulate_pci_bar_write(vgpu, offset, p_data, bytes);
@@ -344,7 +328,6 @@ void intel_vgpu_init_cfg_space(struct in
 	struct intel_gvt *gvt = vgpu->gvt;
 	const struct intel_gvt_device_info *info = &gvt->device_info;
 	u16 *gmch_ctl;
-	int i;
 
 	memcpy(vgpu_cfg_space(vgpu), gvt->firmware.cfg_space,
 	       info->cfg_space_size);
@@ -371,13 +354,13 @@ void intel_vgpu_init_cfg_space(struct in
 	 */
 	memset(vgpu_cfg_space(vgpu) + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1, 0, 4);
 	memset(vgpu_cfg_space(vgpu) + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_3, 0, 4);
+	memset(vgpu_cfg_space(vgpu) + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_4, 0, 8);
 	memset(vgpu_cfg_space(vgpu) + INTEL_GVT_PCI_OPREGION, 0, 4);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < INTEL_GVT_MAX_BAR_NUM; i++) {
-		vgpu->cfg_space.bar[i].size = pci_resource_len(
-					      gvt->dev_priv->drm.pdev, i * 2);
-		vgpu->cfg_space.bar[i].tracked = false;
-	}
+	vgpu->cfg_space.bar[INTEL_GVT_PCI_BAR_GTTMMIO].size =
+				pci_resource_len(gvt->dev_priv->drm.pdev, 0);
+	vgpu->cfg_space.bar[INTEL_GVT_PCI_BAR_APERTURE].size =
+				pci_resource_len(gvt->dev_priv->drm.pdev, 2);
 }
 
 /**


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from changbin.du@intel.com are

queue-4.13/drm-i915-gvt-fix-incorrect-pci-bars-reporting.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-10-02  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1506937305207147@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=changbin.du@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.