All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netlink: do not set cb_running if dump's start() errs
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 14:27:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507552064.26041.50.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507550326.26041.39.camel@sipsolutions.net>

Just decided to take another look:

On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 13:58 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 13:56 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> 
> > @@ -2266,16 +2266,17 @@ int __netlink_dump_start(struct sock *ssk,
> > struct sk_buff *skb,
> >  	cb->min_dump_alloc = control->min_dump_alloc;
> >  	cb->skb = skb;
> >  
> > +	if (cb->start) {
> > +		ret = cb->start(cb);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			goto error_unlock;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	nlk->cb_running = true;
> >  
> >  	mutex_unlock(nlk->cb_mutex);
> 
> Hmm. Now start is invoked with the mutex held, I'm not sure it
> actually _matters_, but that should probably be reviewed and
> mentioned in the commit log?

It sort of seems designed to run ->start outside the lock, otherwise we
wouldn't really have to acquire it again in netlink_dump() but could
just keep it across the call (with some locking changes in
netlink_recvmsg())?

Then again, clearly none of the (few) existing users actually care.

Btw - we should (separately) also remove "start" from struct
netlink_callback, it's only ever used within this function and we can
use control->start instead of cb->start here.

johannes

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-09 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-09 11:56 [PATCH] netlink: do not set cb_running if dump's start() errs Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-09 11:57 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-09 11:58 ` Johannes Berg
2017-10-09 12:12   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-09 12:14     ` [PATCH v2] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-09 12:31       ` Johannes Berg
2017-10-09 17:02         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2017-10-09 17:29       ` David Miller
2017-10-09 12:27   ` Johannes Berg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1507552064.26041.50.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.