Patch "userfaultfd: non-cooperative: fix fork use after free" has been added to the 4.13-stable tree

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    userfaultfd: non-cooperative: fix fork use after free

to the 4.13-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     userfaultfd-non-cooperative-fix-fork-use-after-free.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.13 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 384632e67e0829deb8015ee6ad916b180049d252 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 16:15:38 -0700
Subject: userfaultfd: non-cooperative: fix fork use after free

From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>

commit 384632e67e0829deb8015ee6ad916b180049d252 upstream.

When reading the event from the uffd, we put it on a temporary
fork_event list to detect if we can still access it after releasing and
retaking the event_wqh.lock.

If fork aborts and removes the event from the fork_event all is fine as
long as we're still in the userfault read context and fork_event head is
still alive.

We've to put the event allocated in the fork kernel stack, back from
fork_event list-head to the event_wqh head, before returning from
userfaultfd_ctx_read, because the fork_event head lifetime is limited to
the userfaultfd_ctx_read stack lifetime.

Forgetting to move the event back to its event_wqh place then results in
__remove_wait_queue(&ctx->event_wqh, &ewq->wq); in
userfaultfd_event_wait_completion to remove it from a head that has been
already freed from the reader stack.

This could only happen if resolve_userfault_fork failed (for example if
there are no file descriptors available to allocate the fork uffd).  If
it succeeded it was put back correctly.

Furthermore, after find_userfault_evt receives a fork event, the forked
userfault context in fork_nctx and uwq->msg.arg.reserved.reserved1 can
be released by the fork thread as soon as the event_wqh.lock is
released.  Taking a reference on the fork_nctx before dropping the lock
prevents an use after free in resolve_userfault_fork().

If the fork side aborted and it already released everything, we still
try to succeed resolve_userfault_fork(), if possible.

Fixes: 893e26e61d04eac9 ("userfaultfd: non-cooperative: Add fork() event")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170920180413.26713-1-aarcange@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/userfaultfd.c |   66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -566,6 +566,12 @@ static void userfaultfd_event_wait_compl
 			break;
 		if (ACCESS_ONCE(ctx->released) ||
 		    fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
+			/*
+			 * &ewq->wq may be queued in fork_event, but
+			 * __remove_wait_queue ignores the head
+			 * parameter. It would be a problem if it
+			 * didn't.
+			 */
 			__remove_wait_queue(&ctx->event_wqh, &ewq->wq);
 			if (ewq->msg.event == UFFD_EVENT_FORK) {
 				struct userfaultfd_ctx *new;
@@ -1039,6 +1045,12 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_ctx_read(stru
 					(unsigned long)
 					uwq->msg.arg.reserved.reserved1;
 				list_move(&uwq->wq.entry, &fork_event);
+				/*
+				 * fork_nctx can be freed as soon as
+				 * we drop the lock, unless we take a
+				 * reference on it.
+				 */
+				userfaultfd_ctx_get(fork_nctx);
 				spin_unlock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
 				ret = 0;
 				break;
@@ -1069,19 +1081,53 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_ctx_read(stru
 
 	if (!ret && msg->event == UFFD_EVENT_FORK) {
 		ret = resolve_userfault_fork(ctx, fork_nctx, msg);
+		spin_lock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
+		if (!list_empty(&fork_event)) {
+			/*
+			 * The fork thread didn't abort, so we can
+			 * drop the temporary refcount.
+			 */
+			userfaultfd_ctx_put(fork_nctx);
+
+			uwq = list_first_entry(&fork_event,
+					       typeof(*uwq),
+					       wq.entry);
+			/*
+			 * If fork_event list wasn't empty and in turn
+			 * the event wasn't already released by fork
+			 * (the event is allocated on fork kernel
+			 * stack), put the event back to its place in
+			 * the event_wq. fork_event head will be freed
+			 * as soon as we return so the event cannot
+			 * stay queued there no matter the current
+			 * "ret" value.
+			 */
+			list_del(&uwq->wq.entry);
+			__add_wait_queue(&ctx->event_wqh, &uwq->wq);
 
-		if (!ret) {
-			spin_lock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
-			if (!list_empty(&fork_event)) {
-				uwq = list_first_entry(&fork_event,
-						       typeof(*uwq),
-						       wq.entry);
-				list_del(&uwq->wq.entry);
-				__add_wait_queue(&ctx->event_wqh, &uwq->wq);
+			/*
+			 * Leave the event in the waitqueue and report
+			 * error to userland if we failed to resolve
+			 * the userfault fork.
+			 */
+			if (likely(!ret))
 				userfaultfd_event_complete(ctx, uwq);
-			}
-			spin_unlock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * Here the fork thread aborted and the
+			 * refcount from the fork thread on fork_nctx
+			 * has already been released. We still hold
+			 * the reference we took before releasing the
+			 * lock above. If resolve_userfault_fork
+			 * failed we've to drop it because the
+			 * fork_nctx has to be freed in such case. If
+			 * it succeeded we'll hold it because the new
+			 * uffd references it.
+			 */
+			if (ret)
+				userfaultfd_ctx_put(fork_nctx);
 		}
+		spin_unlock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
 	}
 
 	return ret;


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from aarcange@redhat.com are

queue-4.13/userfaultfd-non-cooperative-fix-fork-use-after-free.patch
queue-4.13/ksm-fix-unlocked-iteration-over-vmas-in-cmp_and_merge_page.patch
queue-4.13/mm-hugetlb-soft_offline-save-compound-page-order-before-page-migration.patch
queue-4.13/mm-oom_reaper-skip-mm-structs-with-mmu-notifiers.patch