All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hch@lst.de,
	marc.zyngier@arm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "genirq/cpuhotplug: Add sanity check for effective affinity mask" has been added to the 4.13-stable tree
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 16:06:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508076409182250@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    genirq/cpuhotplug: Add sanity check for effective affinity mask

to the 4.13-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     genirq-cpuhotplug-add-sanity-check-for-effective-affinity-mask.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.13 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 60b09c51bb4fb46e2331fdbb39f91520f31d35f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 12:47:24 +0200
Subject: genirq/cpuhotplug: Add sanity check for effective affinity mask

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

commit 60b09c51bb4fb46e2331fdbb39f91520f31d35f7 upstream.

The effective affinity mask handling has no safety net when the mask is not
updated by the interrupt chip or the mask contains offline CPUs.

If that happens the CPU unplug code fails to migrate interrupts.

Add sanity checks and emit a warning when the mask contains only offline
CPUs.

Fixes: 415fcf1a2293 ("genirq/cpuhotplug: Use effective affinity mask")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1710042208400.2406@nanos
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/irq/cpuhotplug.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/irq/cpuhotplug.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/cpuhotplug.c
@@ -18,8 +18,34 @@
 static inline bool irq_needs_fixup(struct irq_data *d)
 {
 	const struct cpumask *m = irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(d);
+	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
-	return cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), m);
+#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK
+	/*
+	 * The cpumask_empty() check is a workaround for interrupt chips,
+	 * which do not implement effective affinity, but the architecture has
+	 * enabled the config switch. Use the general affinity mask instead.
+	 */
+	if (cpumask_empty(m))
+		m = irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d);
+
+	/*
+	 * Sanity check. If the mask is not empty when excluding the outgoing
+	 * CPU then it must contain at least one online CPU. The outgoing CPU
+	 * has been removed from the online mask already.
+	 */
+	if (cpumask_any_but(m, cpu) < nr_cpu_ids &&
+	    cpumask_any_and(m, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids) {
+		/*
+		 * If this happens then there was a missed IRQ fixup at some
+		 * point. Warn about it and enforce fixup.
+		 */
+		pr_warn("Eff. affinity %*pbl of IRQ %u contains only offline CPUs after offlining CPU %u\n",
+			cpumask_pr_args(m), d->irq, cpu);
+		return true;
+	}
+#endif
+	return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, m);
 }
 
 static bool migrate_one_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tglx@linutronix.de are

queue-4.13/genirq-cpuhotplug-add-sanity-check-for-effective-affinity-mask.patch
queue-4.13/genirq-cpuhotplug-enforce-affinity-setting-on-startup-of-managed-irqs.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-10-15 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1508076409182250@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.