From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: aggregation: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 22:50:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508359811.2674.56.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jKY5rTuR_w=zj5Bz06f9OrW35eD4sYfkai2Gac_edG4ag@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20171018_161904_357172_FABB3367)
On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 07:19 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Johannes Berg
> <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> > > This has been the least trivial timer conversion yet. Given the use of
> > > RCU and other things I may not even know about, I'd love to get a close
> > > look at this. I *think* this is correct, as it will re-lookup the tid
> > > entries when firing the timer.
> >
> > I'm not really sure why you're doing the lookup again? That seems
> > pointless, since you already have the right structure, and already rely
> > on it being valid. You can't really get a new struct assigned to the
> > same TID without the old one being destroyed.
>
> I couldn't tell what the lifetime expectation was, so I left the
> re-lookup. I assumed it was possible to have a timer fire after the
> structure had been removed from the station structure.
Oh, right, I guess that would've been possible in theory. It's not
actually possible though since the aggregation sessions can't live on
without a station, so I've already made a follow-up patch to remove the
indirection.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-18 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-17 20:25 [PATCH] mac80211: aggregation: Convert timers to use timer_setup() Kees Cook
2017-10-18 10:29 ` Johannes Berg
2017-10-18 11:31 ` Johannes Berg
2017-10-18 11:37 ` Johannes Berg
2017-10-18 14:17 ` Kees Cook
2017-10-18 14:19 ` Kees Cook
2017-10-18 20:50 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2017-10-18 21:02 ` Kees Cook
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-10-16 22:08 Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1508359811.2674.56.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.