From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jarno@ovn.org, alexander.levin@verizon.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, joe@ovn.org, pablo@netfilter.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "netfilter: nf_ct_expect: Change __nf_ct_expect_check() return value." has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 15:19:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508419193219164@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
netfilter: nf_ct_expect: Change __nf_ct_expect_check() return value.
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
netfilter-nf_ct_expect-change-__nf_ct_expect_check-return-value.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Thu Oct 19 15:15:46 CEST 2017
From: Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@ovn.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:08:54 -0800
Subject: netfilter: nf_ct_expect: Change __nf_ct_expect_check() return value.
From: Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@ovn.org>
[ Upstream commit 4b86c459c7bee3acaf92f0e2b4c6ac803eaa1a58 ]
Commit 4dee62b1b9b4 ("netfilter: nf_ct_expect: nf_ct_expect_insert()
returns void") inadvertently changed the successful return value of
nf_ct_expect_related_report() from 0 to 1 due to
__nf_ct_expect_check() returning 1 on success. Prevent this
regression in the future by changing the return value of
__nf_ct_expect_check() to 0 on success.
Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@ovn.org>
Acked-by: Joe Stringer <joe@ovn.org>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_expect.c
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ static inline int __nf_ct_expect_check(s
struct net *net = nf_ct_exp_net(expect);
struct hlist_node *next;
unsigned int h;
- int ret = 1;
+ int ret = 0;
if (!master_help) {
ret = -ESHUTDOWN;
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ int nf_ct_expect_related_report(struct n
spin_lock_bh(&nf_conntrack_expect_lock);
ret = __nf_ct_expect_check(expect);
- if (ret <= 0)
+ if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = nf_ct_expect_insert(expect);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jarno@ovn.org are
queue-4.4/netfilter-nf_ct_expect-change-__nf_ct_expect_check-return-value.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-10-19 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1508419193219164@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@verizon.com \
--cc=jarno@ovn.org \
--cc=joe@ovn.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.