From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luca Boccassi Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ethdev: pre-emptively document rte_eth_dev_reset error code Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 13:01:00 +0100 Message-ID: <1508846460.29685.19.camel@debian.org> References: <20171019134827.22740-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <20171019134827.22740-2-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <1508429659.31273.2.camel@debian.org> <8de2f02a-5434-3fb8-8fed-7bb013f6c49c@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, wei.dai@intel.com To: Remy Horton , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B16D1B7CD for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:01:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id b9so10049089wmh.0 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 05:01:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8de2f02a-5434-3fb8-8fed-7bb013f6c49c@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 07:18 +0100, Remy Horton wrote: > On 19/10/2017 17:14, Luca Boccassi wrote: > [..] > > We've adapted and used these patches with the early > > rte_eth_dev_reset > > for a year in production now, and we had a customer who requested > > it > > since they were running into the problem it solves (PF flaps). > >=20 > > I have adapted them on the latest 17.11 tree and tested with X540 > > 10gbit cards, and it seems to work as before. Should I send an RFC > > and > > CC all of you? >=20 > Since it sounds stable, probably best to post the updated/rebased > patch.=C2=A0 > Should get merged as long as nothing breaks. I can send an RFC later today. >=20 > > Incidentally, are there specific reasons why the VF functionality > > was > > dropped since the first patches were sent? >=20 > I'm personally not sure, but the others should know. --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi