From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] housekeeping: Use its own static key
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 15:06:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508850421-10058-6-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1508850421-10058-1-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org>
Housekeeping code still depends on nohz_full static key. Since we want
to decouple housekeeping from nohz, let's create a housekeeping own static
key. It's mostly relevant for calls to is_housekeeping_cpu() from the
scheduler.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/housekeeping.h | 3 ++-
kernel/housekeeping.c | 14 +++++++++-----
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/housekeeping.h b/include/linux/housekeeping.h
index 31a1401..cbe8d63 100644
--- a/include/linux/housekeeping.h
+++ b/include/linux/housekeeping.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/tick.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(housekeeping_overriden);
extern int housekeeping_any_cpu(void);
extern const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(void);
extern void housekeeping_affine(struct task_struct *t);
@@ -31,7 +32,7 @@ static inline void housekeeping_init(void) { }
static inline bool is_housekeeping_cpu(int cpu)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
- if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overriden))
return housekeeping_test_cpu(cpu);
#endif
return true;
diff --git a/kernel/housekeeping.c b/kernel/housekeeping.c
index 0e70dc8..272c344 100644
--- a/kernel/housekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/housekeeping.c
@@ -10,12 +10,15 @@
#include <linux/tick.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/static_key.h>
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(housekeeping_overriden);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_overriden);
static cpumask_var_t housekeeping_mask;
int housekeeping_any_cpu(void)
{
- if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overriden))
return cpumask_any_and(housekeeping_mask, cpu_online_mask);
return smp_processor_id();
@@ -23,7 +26,7 @@ int housekeeping_any_cpu(void)
const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(void)
{
- if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overriden))
return housekeeping_mask;
return cpu_possible_mask;
@@ -31,19 +34,18 @@ const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(void)
void housekeeping_affine(struct task_struct *t)
{
- if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overriden))
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(t, housekeeping_mask);
}
bool housekeeping_test_cpu(int cpu)
{
- if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overriden))
return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, housekeeping_mask);
return true;
}
-
void __init housekeeping_init(void)
{
if (!tick_nohz_full_enabled())
@@ -59,6 +61,8 @@ void __init housekeeping_init(void)
cpumask_andnot(housekeeping_mask,
cpu_possible_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
+ static_branch_enable(&housekeeping_overriden);
+
/* We need at least one CPU to handle housekeeping work */
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_empty(housekeeping_mask));
}
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-24 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-24 13:06 [GIT PULL] Introduce housekeeping subsystem v5 Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 13:06 ` [PATCH 01/12] housekeeping: Move housekeeping related code to its own file Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 13:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-24 14:49 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 13:06 ` [PATCH 02/12] watchdog: Use housekeeping_cpumask() instead of ad-hoc version Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 14:49 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 13:06 ` [PATCH 03/12] housekeeping: Provide a dynamic off-case to housekeeping_any_cpu() Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 14:50 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 13:06 ` [PATCH 04/12] housekeeping: Make housekeeping cpumask private Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 14:50 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 13:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2017-10-24 14:50 ` [tip:sched/core] housekeeping: Use its own static key tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 13:06 ` [PATCH 06/12] housekeeping: Rename is_housekeeping_cpu to housekeeping_cpu Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 14:51 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 13:06 ` [PATCH 07/12] housekeeping: Move it under its own config, independant from NO_HZ Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 14:51 ` [tip:sched/core] housekeeping: Move it under its own config, independent " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 13:06 ` [PATCH 08/12] housekeeping: Introduce housekeeping flags Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 14:52 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 13:06 ` [PATCH 09/12] housekeeping: Handle nohz_full= parameter Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 14:52 ` [tip:sched/core] housekeeping: Handle the " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 13:06 ` [PATCH 10/12] housekeeping: Move isolcpus to housekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 13:07 ` [PATCH 11/12] housekeeping: Add basic isolcpus flags Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-24 13:07 ` [PATCH 12/12] housekeeping: Document " Frederic Weisbecker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-10-27 2:42 [GIT PULL] Housekeeping subsystem v6 Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 05/12] housekeeping: Use its own static key Frederic Weisbecker
2017-09-18 13:53 [GIT PULL] Introduce housekeeping subsystem v4 Frederic Weisbecker
2017-09-18 13:54 ` [PATCH 05/12] housekeeping: Use its own static key Frederic Weisbecker
2017-09-01 16:41 [PATCH 00/12] Introduce housekeeping subsystem v3 Frederic Weisbecker
2017-09-01 16:41 ` [PATCH 05/12] housekeeping: Use its own static key Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1508850421-10058-6-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.